5 Amendments of Georgi PIRINSKI related to 2018/2219(DEC)
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the Court’s findings and conclusions, and invitesregrets that the Commission has noto taken them into consideration when preparing the proposals for respective regulations for the next programming period;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. InviteRegrets, in particular, the Commission to consider whether maintaining ex-ante conditionalities for the post-2020 perioat some of the criteria proposed by the Commission in its proposal for the Common Provisions Regulation 2021-2027 may not affect the implementation of the related specific objectives and would not materially improve efficiency and effectiveness of the Cohesion policy, contrary to the ECA’s recommendation in this regard;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines, in case ex-ante conditionalities are maintained and replaced by enabling conditions in the next programming period, that they have to be appropriate for the national and regional context, incentive -oriented and conducive to smooth implementation of regional development objectives, as well as excluding overlaps and room for ambiguity, and differing interpretations;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that around 75 % of all applicable ex-ante conditionalities were fulfilled at the time of adoption of ESIF programmes, that 86 % were fulfilled at the beginning of 2017 and that 989 % at the beginning ofby May 2018, demonstrating that the fulfilment of ex-ante conditionalities was longer than the period envisaged under Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 (the ‘Common Provisions Regulation’) and that by the deadline of December 2016 deadline, around 15% of ex-ante conditionalities remained unfulfilled;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13