10 Amendments of Brando BENIFEI related to 2020/2015(INI)
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out to the fact that creations made by AI, if marketed, could generate distortions in the cultural and creative sector, affecting pricing and remuneration to the detriment of human creators;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas AI technologies are heavily dependent on data, a blanket term for information falling into a range of categories that requires protection and tailoredgovernance; whereas increased access to certain data and databases in the European Union will play a crucial role inlarge volumes of data; whereas increased access to certain data and databases in the European Union as well as interoperability of data, which limits lock-in effects, will play a crucial role in ensuring fair market conditions in the Digital Single Market and advancing the development of European AI;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Suggests that assessment focus on the impact and implications of AI technology under the current system of patent law, trade mark and design protection, copyright and related rights, including the applicability of the legal protection of databases and computer programs, and the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (‘trade secrets’) against ; stresses, however, that the protection of intellectual property and trade secrets must always be reconciled with otheir funlawful acquisition, use and disclosure;damental rights and freedoms emphasises, further, the need to assess whether contract law and competition rules ought to be strengthened in order to create a more comprehensive legal framework for the economic sectors in which AI plays a part;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that patent protection can be granted provided that the invention is new and not self-evident and involves an inventive step; notes, further, that patent law requires a comprehensive description of the underlying technology, which may pose challenges for certain AI technologies in view of the complexity of the reasoning; stresses also that reverse engineering is an exception to the trade secrets rule that may pose IPR-related problems in the context of the development of AI technologies;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Considers that intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies and intellectual property rights for content generated by AI should be kept separate; stresses that intellectual property rights protect human-generated work; warns that creations and inventions by AI, if marketed, could generate market distortions, affecting pricing and remuneration to the detriment of human creators and concentrating the market in favour of AI owners;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the importance of full implementation of the Digital Single Market Strategy in order to improve data accessibility and interoperability in the EU; stresses the need to assess in that connection whether EU rules on intellectual property are capable of protecting the data needed for the development of AIrisk to create unnecessary barriers to access to data; considers that comprehensive information should be provided on the use of data protected by IPRs, in particular in the context of platform-to-business relationships;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that the Commission is considering the desirability of legislation on issues that have an impact on relationships between economic operators whose purpose is to make use of data, one element in which is the evaluation of the IPR framework, includWelcomes the fact that the Commission is considering a possible revision of the Database Directive and a possible clarification of the application of the directive on the protection of trade secrets as a generic framework; looks forward to the results of the public consultation procedure launched by the Commission on the European Data Strategy;