16 Amendments of Nikolay BAREKOV related to 2016/0379(COD)
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) setting the basis for an efficient achievement of the objectives of the European Energy Union and in particular the climate and energy framework for 203030 by enabling market signals to be delivered for increased flexibility, decarbonisation and innovation; _________________ 30 COM/2014/015 final. COM/2014/015 final.
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) setting fundamental principles for well-functioning, integrated electricity markets, which allow non-discriminatory market access for all resource providers and electricity customers, empower consumers, enable demand response and energy efficiency, facilitate aggregation of distributed demand and supply, and contribute to the decarbonisation of the economy bys well as enablinge market integration and market- based remuneration of electricity generated from renewable sources;
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) market rules shall support the decarbonisation of the economy by enablinge the integration of electricity from renewable energy sources and providinge incentives for energy efficiency;
Amendment 664 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Amendment 675 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. TIf the review reveals that the bidding zone configuration has important impact on neighbouring TSO’s control areas by causing flows overloading the network and creating internal congestion, thus threating the system stability, the transmission system operators participating in the bidding zone review shall submit a proposalsuch a case to the Commission regarding whether to amend or maintainwith a proposal regarding an amendment of the bidding zone configuration. Based on that proposal, the Commission shall adopt a decision whether to amend or maintainamending the bidding zone configuration, [no later than 6 months after entry into force of this Regulation, specific date to be inserted by OP] or by six months after the conclusion of the bidding zone configuration launched in accordance with points (a), (b) or (c) of Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1222, whichever comes later.
Amendment 682 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5
Article 13 – paragraph 5
5. The decision referred to in paragraph 4 shall be based on the result of the bidding zone review and the transmission system operators’ proposal concerning its maintenance or amendment. The decision shall be justified, in particular as regards possible deviations from the result of the bidding zone review.
Amendment 684 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6
Article 13 – paragraph 6
Amendment 690 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7
Article 13 – paragraph 7
7. TMember States or the Commission shall consult relevant stakeholders on its, including Member States not participating in the bidding zone review on their decisions under this Article before they are adopted.
Amendment 698 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 8
Article 13 – paragraph 8
8. The Commission decisiondecisions adopted under this Article shall specify the date of implementation of a change. That implementation date shall balance the need for expediency with practical considerations, including forward trade of electricity. The Commisdecisions may define appropriate transitional arrangements as part of its decision.
Amendment 702 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The maximum capacity of the interconnections and/or the transmission networks affecting cross-border flows shall be made available to market participants, complying with safety standards of secure network operation. Counter-trading and redispatch, including cross-border redispatch, shall be used to maxoptimise available capacities unlesas long as it is demonstrated that it is not beneficial to economic efficiency at Union level. the foreseen related costs are not expected to be higher than social welfare benefits. The costs of counter-trading and redispatch, including cross-border redispatch shall be shared based on the “polluter-pays principle”, where the unscheduled flows over the overloaded network elements, should be identified as polluters and they should contribute to the costs in proportion to their contribution to the overload.
Amendment 711 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Transmission system operators shall not limit the volume of interconnection capacity to be made available to other market participants in order to solve congestion inside their own control area or, except for congestion on internal network elements with cross-border relevance. Transmission system operators may limit the volume of interconnection capacity to be made available to market participants as a means of managing flows on a border between two control areas observed even without any transaction, that is to say flows over control areas caused by origin and destination within one control area, which are below the level of threshold established within capacity calculation region.
Amendment 836 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall monitor resource adequacy within their territory based on the European resource adequacy assessment pursuant to Article 19national resource adequacy assessment, which shall consider the European resource adequacy assessment pursuant to Article 19. The methodology for a national resource adequacy assessment shall be determined by a Member State and shall take into account the methodology referred to in Article 19(4).
Amendment 862 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Where the Europeana national resource adequacy assessment identifies a resource adequacy concern Member States shall identify any regulatory distortions that caused or contributed to the emergence of the concern.
Amendment 1062 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 4
Article 23 – paragraph 4
Amendment 1156 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. By [OP: twelve months after entry into force], all transmission system operators shall establish regional operational centresecurity coordinators in accordance with the criteria set out in this chapter. Regional operational centresecurity coordinators shall be established in the territory of one of the Member States of the capacity calculation region where it will operate.
Amendment 1162 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
Article 32 – paragraph 3
3. Regional operational centres shall complement the role ofsecurity coordinators shall support transmission system operators by performing functionadvisory services of regional relevance. They shall establish operational arrangementadvise and issue recommendations in order to ensure the efficient, secure and reliable operation of the interconnected transmission system.