Activities of Angel DZHAMBAZKI related to 2014/2232(INI)
Legal basis opinions (0)
Amendments (6)
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 22 a (new)
Citation 22 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 11 February 2015 on the renewal of the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum20 a, __________________ 20 a Texts Adopted, P8_TA(2015)0033
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 22 b (new)
Citation 22 b (new)
- having regard to its resolution on the Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2013 and the European Union’s policy on the matter 21 a, __________________ 21 a Texts Adopted, P8_TA(2015)0076
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas technological developments and unlimited access to the open internet enablesare enormously important for ensuring full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, exerting a positive effect by expanding the scope of freedom of expression, access to information, the right to privacy and freedom of assembly and association across the world;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission and the Council to support, train and empowerassist human rights defenders, civil society activists and independent journalists using ICTs in their activities, and to promote the related fundamental rights of privacy, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and freedom of association online;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines that the digital collection and dissemination of evidencedata ofn human rights violations can contribute to the global fight against impunity; considers that such material should be admissible under and international terrorism; recommends that mechanisms be created in the field of international (criminal) law as evidencefor the introduction of procedures through which such data is authenticated and collected for use as proof in court proceedings;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Considers mass surveillance to be disproportionate at all times, henchat is not justified by a heightened risk from terrorist threats to be in violation of the principles of necessity and proportionality, and, therefore, a violation of human rights;