Activities of Angel DZHAMBAZKI related to 2020/2018(INL)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION with recommendations to the Commission on Digital Services Act: Improving the functioning of the Single Market
Legal basis opinions (0)
Amendments (4)
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that since the online activities of individuals allow for deep insights into their personality and make it possible to manipulate them, the collection and use of personal data concerning the use of digital servicesmay involve the collection and use of personal data, they should be subjected to a specific privacy framework and limited to the extent necessary to provide and bill the use of the service;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that automated tools armay, in certain circumstances, be unable to differentiate illegal content from content that is legal in a given context; highlights that human review of automated reports by service providers does not solve this problem as private staff lack the independence, qualification and accountability of public authorities; stresses, therefore, that the Digital Services Act should explicitly prohibit anymay assist in this regard; stresses, furthermore, that the Commission should evaluate the feasibility and proportionality, taking into account the type, nature and risk of content, of obligations on hosting service providers or other technical intermediaries to use automated tools for content moderation, and refrain from imposing notice-and- stay-down mechanisms; insists that content moderation procedures used by providers should not lead to any ex-in particular those used to protect children from illegal content online, while taking into account a wide rantge control measures basedof stakeholder views on automated tools orand upload-filtering of contentillegal content and ensuring the protection of fundamental rights;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the responsibility for enforcing the law, deciding on the legality of online activities and ordering hosting service providers to remove or disable access to illegal content as soon as possible to protect users should rest with independentMember States' judicial authorities; considers that onlyce a hosting service provider that has actual knowledge of illegal content and its illegal nature should be subject to content, removal obligations should be fulfilled without delay;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that, in order to overcome the lock-in effect of centralised networks and to ensure competition and consumer choice, users of dominant social media services and messaging services should be given a right to, where appropriate, enable cross-platform interaction via open interfaces (interconnectivity).