8 Amendments of Anders VISTISEN related to 2017/2280(INI)
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is concerned, however, about a variety of other findings, including the lack of political guidance and overarching vision, inconsistent implementation of EU values and partnership principles, the slow or non-existent progress of objectives related to social and juridical reform in the wider Neighbourhood, the absence of evaluation mechanisms and the lack of flexibility;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomEncourages efforts to make IPA II more strategic and results-orientated through long-termally relevant in the long term and deliver concrete results through beneficiary-specific planning and a sectoral approach;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets the current systemic and political inabilitinability and lack of political resilience necessary to suspend or reroute IPA II funds in cases where countries do not meet their commitments or exhibit severe political backsliding;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Recalls that IPA II was intended to secure crucial social and juridical reforms, inter alia, in beneficiary countries, with a view toward improving regional security in the long-term; notes that in many beneficiary countries these reforms have yet to materialise and that the extent of clearly observable positive results directly linked to IPA II is not at all evident;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Calls for tangible progress on crucial reform-related goals in neighbouring countries, particularly where those reforms have stalled or otherwise been delayed; notes that in the absence of such reforms the validity and efficacy of IPA II as a whole is called into question;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines the need to take into account the link between stabilisation, conflict prevention, respect for human rights, education that promotes the values of peace and tolerance, and socioeconomic development;
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Reiterates that reform of the current instrument architecture is required in order to regulate conflicts of interest, provide more flexibility, efficiency, coherence and responsiveness, and would also increase cost-effectiveness, accountability, transparency and public oversight;
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
Paragraph 49
49. Underlines the importance of the more-for-more and conditionality principles; considers that stronger conditionality mechanisms should be set up under which direct budget support to state authorities and, government bodies and non- state actors can be suspended in cases where such institutionbeneficiaries do not comply with the objectives of the dispersed funding, or violate the rule of law and human rights;