BETA

4 Amendments of Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI related to 2016/2072(INI)

Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the digital environment offersmay present new opportunities for creators to produce and distribute their works to a wider public at a lower cost, independently of physical and geographical constraints; notes however, that an increasingly connected and digitised forum may cause an increased financial strain on creators with limited resources, when being placed in a larger competitive sphere;
2016/09/13
Committee: JURI
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls in this context that CCIs predominantly consist of a myriad of micro-, small and medium sized enterprises and freelancers, with limited bargaining power vis-à-vis the new digital outlets and illegal non-passive intermediary activities;
2016/09/13
Committee: JURI
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses thereforeNotes, that business models are challenged by continuous digital innovation and that the economic value of content is being displaced towards the end of the value chain thereby upsetting the system through which the creative community draws value from content, while facing losses resulting also from piracyneeds to be redefined in order to establish a modern approach when it comes to assessing effects of increased digitization;
2016/09/13
Committee: JURI
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission, to encourage enhanced cooperation between Member States authorities and industry in order to effectively address the circulation of illegal digital content and to examine the different options, focusing on copyright related contracts, for improving fair remuneration of creators thereby rewarding creativity and innovation while promoting transparency in the copyright value chain in the digital environment, and safeguarding national cultural and linguistic specificities and stimulating economic activity;
2016/09/13
Committee: JURI