BETA

6 Amendments of Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI related to 2014/2256(INI)

Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that embedding and linking should not be considered acts of communication to the public and thus should not be subject to Article 3 of the directivelinking from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet; calls on the EU legislator to make clear that, as a technical tool, linking may be used both for copyright non-relevant activities and for copyright relevant activities that require rightholders' permission; therefore building business models based on mass linking to illegal content should be regarded as copyright infringement;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the need to update the concept of ‘reproduction of works’ by taking into account the possibilities offered by digital technologies in terms of communication to the public;deleted
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Urges for the establishment of mandatory limitations and exceptions to copyright, at least with regard to the most important excepprovided for in existing copyright legislations, such as those in the field of education, research and, libraries and museums, to allow for the more widespread dissemination of cultural content across the EU; ontent across the Union, while taking into account the freedom of expression and information, freedom of the arts and sciences, religious and linguistic diversity;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights the fact that a general exception should be introduced to offer a broader interpretation of the current exceptions based on the analogue model, while taking into account the freedom of expression and information, freedom of the arts and sciences and cultural, religious and linguistic diversity, as referred to in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;deleted
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Suggests a review of the liability of service providers to guarantee the dissemination of culture across the EU and in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rightsand intermediaries in order to clarify their legal status and liability with regards to copyrights to ensure a fair remuneration for creators and rightholders and to guarantee the dissemination of culture across the Union;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 115 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses the necessity for authors and performers to be provided with legal protection for their creative and artistic work; taking into account specificity of the audiovisual sector recommends introducing an unwaivable right to remuneration for authors of audiovisual works for making their works available;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT