BETA

5 Amendments of Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI related to 2014/2220(INI)

Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Looks to the Heads of State or Government at the European Council meeting to agree new measures to counter the threats that emerged in 2014 and also to decide to draw up at the earliest opportunity a strategy paper analysing those threats and the action the EU may take in response to them;
2015/01/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Considers the issue of financing for CSDP missions and operations to be crucial if the policy is to have a future; finds it regrettable that specific proposals have not yet emerged from the discussion initiated on this subject by the December 2013 Council; calls for the Athena mechanism to be used as a matter of course for the financing of expenditure on CSDP operational and mission deployment, in particular in connection with the use of EU battlegroups, and for the same mechanism to manage financing received from Member States on a bilateral basis as well as from third countries and other international organisations, so that they can participate in the financing of a given operation and, in duly justified cases, support the participation by third countries in EU crisis response operations and missions;
2015/01/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Takes note of the Commission communication of July 2013 entitled ‘Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector’ and of the roadmap of June 2014 on its implementation with its proposals, in particular, for improved implementation of the single market directives 2009/81/EC and 2009/43/EC, without prejudice to Member States’ sovereign rights as established in Article 346 of the TFEU;
2015/01/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Believes that all the measures in question are contingent on the prior joint determination of what falls within the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) so that potential beneficiary companies or strategic activities can be targeted, with due regard for the capacity differences between the Member States’ defence industries;
2015/01/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. Believes that no government can embark alone on genuinely large-scale research and technology (R&T) programmes; welcomes, therefore, the Commission’s proposals for developing synergies between civilian and defencesecurity research; also welcomes the initiation of ‘Preparatory Actions’ and hopes that, in the realm of the CSDP, the next step will be funding, under the forthcoming multiannual financial framework, for a relevant research strand;
2015/01/30
Committee: AFET