4 Amendments of Michał MARUSIK related to 2015/2342(INI)
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes thawith regret theat insufficient size of Heading 4 and the Emergency Aid Reserve in particular has led connection with the ‘immigration crisis’ the Commission tohas resorted to satellite budgetary mechanisms, such as trust funds and the Facility for Refugees in Turkey, to top up the funding available; notes that this aim has not always been met with full success;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes with regret that refocusing the EU’s external financing instruments towards security, peace building and conflict resolution, migration and border management poses new challenges in relation to the initial objectives and principles of these instruments;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes, however,Has misgivings about the Commission proposal for a new European External Investment Plan, with a new focus on investment to promote economic and social development in the EU Neighbourhood and Africa; also expresses doubts, however, as to whether the proposal is ambitious enough to fully harness the EU’s borrowing and lending potential as to the usefulness of such action;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. WelcomesHas misgivings about the Commission proposal on the revision of the MFF, in particular with regard to endowing the EU budget with larger crisis instruments; expects the proposed revision of the financial rules to reconcile the necessary flexibility and accountability.