BETA

9 Amendments of Jana ŽITŇANSKÁ related to 2016/2242(INI)

Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. having regard to the European Court of Auditors’ special report on the impact on youth employment of the Youth Guarantee and the Youth Employment Initiative, which finds that the current situation, more than three years after the adoption of the Council recommendation, falls short of the initial expectations 1a _________________ 1aSpecial Report No 5/2017: Youth unemployment – have EU policies made a difference? An assessment of the Youth Guarantee and the Youth Employment Initiative, p. 8
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the importance of setting realistic targets in promoting policies and frameworks such as the Youth Guarantee; stresses in this connection the recommendation by the European Court of Auditors that the Member States prioritise the measures to be implemented according to available financing;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that programmes such as the Youth Guarantee must not be a substitute for Member States’ own efforts to fight youth unemployment;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that the Youth Guarantee must be the framework for the sustainable labour market integration of all groups of young people, including people with disabilities;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that the Member States are responsible for monitoring, reporting and the quality of the data provided, which are prerequisites for improving policies for activating young people;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls on the Commission to help the Member States to minimise the risk of overstatement of results;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Notes that in some Member States the rate of positive outcomes after leaving the Youth Guarantee scheme has deteriorated; notes that the situation is further complicated by the problems the Member States have in providing data on the ongoing situation of participants;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #
6a. Considers it essential for offer quality to match labour market demand and participant profiles;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Stresses that the objective of the Youth Guarantee should be sustainable integration into the labour market.
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL