BETA

14 Amendments of Stanisław ŻÓŁTEK related to 2018/2001(BUD)

Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas, in the case of the US House of Representatives, the total appropriations dedicated to the representational allowance of Members amounted to 500 million for 435 Representatives8 , whereas for Parliament, those appropriations amounted to 458 million for 751 MEPs9 ; __________________ 8CRS report on Legislative Branch: FY2016 Appropriations, 1 February 2016. 9 Report of the Secretary General to the Bureau on the Preliminary Draft Estimates of the European Parliament for the Financial Year 2019;deleted
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the share of Parliament’s budget in 2019 should be maintained under 20 % of heading V; notes that the level of estimates for 2019 corresponds to 18,79%, which is lower than that achieved in 2018 (18,85 %) and the lowest part of heading V in more than fifteen yearsRegrets the increase proposed by the Secretary-General for Parliament’s preliminary draft estimates reaching the outrageous amount of more than EUR 2 billion for 2019;
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. EmphasisNotes that the largest part of Parliament's budget is fixed by statutory or contractual obligations and is subject to annual indexation; asks therefore for a revision of the Statute for Members and the Staff Regulations in order to abolish unacceptable benefits;
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights Parliament's role in building European political awareness and promoting the Union values;deleted
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that savings compared to the proposal of the Secretary-General are required, but the priority is the efficient use of the budget, without undermining the core competences of the European Parliament;
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the response to the request from the Committee on Budgets expressed in various budget resolutions on additional information on medium- and long-term planning, investments, statutory obligations, operational expenditure and a methodology on the basis of the current needs rather than of coefficients; notes that lump sums are a useful and recognised tool to add flexibility and transparency;
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that, as was the case for budgets for previous years, it is proposed to set aside an amount for ‘extraordinary’ investment and expenditure, i.e. investment and expenditure that is unusual or atypical for Parliament and arises infrequently; notes that in 2019, those underlinvestments and that expenditure amount to EUR 71,6 million, including EUR 37,3 million for the changes related to European Elections 2019 should not be considered as "extraordinary", since the length of pa Parliamentary term and EUR 34,3 million for other extraordinary expendituris known in advance;
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs confirmed with the vote in plenary in February 2018 an own- initiative report on Parliament’s composition, and notably the reduction to 705 Members after the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union; notes that in the event that the United Kingdom is still a Member State at the beginning of the 2019-2024 parliamentary term, the number of Members shall be 751, until the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union becomes legally effective; points out, however, that the procedure requires a unanimous decision by the European Council after having obtained the consent of Parliament; underlines that Parliament’s estimates, for the moment, reflect a status- quo situation with a Parliament composed of 751 Members from 28 Member States; recalls that any decrease of the number of Members should be reflected in a due reduction the Parliament’s estimates;
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. WelcomDeplores the communication campaign as a helpful effort to explain the purpose of the Union and the Parliament to the citizens; underlines that this campaign should aim, among other things, at explaining the role of the Union, the power of the Parliament, its functions, including the election of the President of the Commission, and its impact on the lives of citizepropaganda tool to the exclusive benefit of the EU policies and institutions;
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Recallsthat, as approved in the 2018 budget procedure,grets that the total budget of the campaign amounts to EUR 33,3 million for the two years, of which EUR 25 million for 2018 (due to the time needed to run procurement procedures and conclude the contracts) and EUR 8.33 million for 2019; notes that the strategy for the campaign based on an analysis of the lessons learnt at the last elections was approved at the Bureau in November 2017and EUR 8.33 million for 2019;
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Underlines that the communication processes for the European elections are characterised by three tiers: the most visible tier is for national and European political parties and their candidates, the second tier is the leading candidate process (Spitzenkandidaten), introduced for the first time in 2014, and the third tier is the institutional campaign as in reminding what the Parliament is, what it does, how it affects citizens’ lives and why engaging in the elections is important;deleted
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights that Parliament alone lacks the resources necessary to reach out to 400 million eligible voters and must therefore make the best use of its own multiplier networks to do that; points out that at European level, a series of citizens and stakeholders conferences will be organised in 2018 and that at national level, the role of the Liaison Offices will be crucial; considers that as in the final run-up to the elections, the European political parties and the national parties will play an essential role alongside, in particular in the framework of the “Spitzenkandidaten” process; proposes, therefore, to enable them to carry out this mission with funding specifically increased for 2019;deleted
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Takes note of the updated mission statement forQuestions the added value of the Information Offices, which are now to be known as “Liaison Offices”, in accordance with the the Bureau Decision of November 2017; notes that the main function of the Liaison Offices is to inform and communicate locally on behalf of Parliament, in order to provide information about the Union and its policies through the activities of external stakeholder; regrets the excessive expenditures for the new installations oin local, regional and national levelBerlin and Paris;
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34 a. Notes with regrets the extremely late forwarding of the documents from the Secretary-General and the Bureau to the Budgets Committee Members that did not allow a proper work on the file;
2018/03/14
Committee: BUDG