16 Amendments of Edouard MARTIN related to 2015/2322(INI)
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas national poorly designed capacity markets make it harderight generate difficulties to integrate electricity markets and could run contrary to the objectives of the common energy policy;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the objective of energy security defined by the Treaties will be essential for the consolidation of the Energy Union and that therefore adequate instruments to ensure it have to be preserved and/or implemented
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that a new Energy Union Market design is needed to ensure a successful transition through to a more secure, affordable, flexible, efficient, carbon free, sustainable energy system.
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to be more pro-actively involved in the design of a European internal market in electricity and to avoid the creation of non-market based capacity mechanisms which could undermininge the objectives of Articles 114 and 194 TFEU by means of permanent capacity markets;
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Considers that investments in the field of energy require a stable and predictable long term framework, and that the challenge EU has to face will be to instil confidence in the result of the new rules.
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses, while pleading for a closer cooperation, the right of Member States to determine the conditions for the use of their energy resources, the national energy mix and the overall structure of their energy supply;
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that network expansion in particular is indispensable with a view to completing the internal market in electricity with a growing share of renewables; regrets that there are still large gaps in the interconnections between some Member States, leading to network bottlenecks and significantly impairing cross-border energy trading; calls for the electricity interconnection objectives to be differentiated by region, and aligned with the ENTSO-E ten-year network plan;
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Understands that because of the low price of energy on the wholesale markets and its impact on investment and of the need to develop mechanism to adapt the production capacity to the flexibility needed to answer the demand side, several Member States, in the absence of a European approach and due to specific components of their consumption market, had to develop capacity mechanisms;
Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Is sceptical ofConsiders that capacity mechanisms on the grounds ofneed to be designed in order to avoid higher costs and theintroduction of risks of market distortions, and stresse; recalls that national capacity markets are subject tohave to carefully respect the EU rules on competition and state aid;
Amendment 309 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls foronsiders that national capacity mechanisms onlyhave to be authorised where a detailed analysis ofcarefully analysed, on a fair basis, notably the production and supply situation at regnational level has been carried out in advance and a bottleneck has been identified which cannot be eliminated by less stringent measures such as a strategic reserveand regional level ;
Amendment 332 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. IConsistders that national capacity markets should be opentechnology neutral, equally open to generation and demand- side response ; that they should aim to be opened to cross-border participation and; they should only create the capacity strictly necessarbe proportionate and only create the necessary capacity for security of supply;
Amendment 355 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
Amendment 388 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. NoteRecalls that the expectation of future price surges can create incentives for producers and investors to invest in production capacity, particularly in high- efficiency modern gas-fired power stations, urges politicians not to intervene in the market even in the evmain obstacle to more dynamic pricing is not legal but technical, pending the deployment of smart meters; notes that, in this context, the continuation of regulated tariffs by means of proportionate and transparent measures does not exclude the dynamic elements of large price surges and calls, in the medium term, for the complete abolition of regulated final consumer pricespricing and does not prevent the competitive functioning of the market; observes that, furthermore, regulated tariffs remain a preponderant tool for fighting energy poverty;
Amendment 528 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Stresses that greater consideration must be given to distribution system operators’ (DSO) local and regional responsibility for the energy union; rejects, however, the unbundling of distribution systems beyond the scope of existing legislation, since the current rules have proved their usefulness and the consumer has a free choice of suppliers;
Amendment 534 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses that renewables shouldare in most cases be fed in at distribution systems level, and therefore calls for distribution system operators to have a greater role overall and to be more closely involved in the European regulatory bodies to elaborate high level guidelines on various common issues such as demand/response, flexibility, DSO/TSO interface or storage;
Amendment 558 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Regards distribution system operators as neutral market pioneefacilitators receiving data from various sources, which they can then make available in a non-discriminatory manner to authorised third parties with the consent of the consumer; considers that DSOs foster the development of the market, have an increasingly important role as active system managers technological enablers, data managers and innovators and constitute a great support to the local authorities in providing them with data that can facilitate the energy transition on their territories;