BETA

19 Amendments of Therese COMODINI CACHIA related to 2014/0121(COD)

Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Since remuneration is one of the key instruments for companies to align their interests and those of their directors and in view of the crucial role of directors in companies, it is important that the remuneration policy of companies is determined in an appropriate manner. Without prejudice to the provisions on remuneration of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council17 listed companies and their shareholders should have the possibility to define the remuneration policy of the directors of their company, taking into account the differences in board structures applied by companies in the different Member States, in accordance with national law. __________________ 17Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338.
2015/02/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Transactions with related parties may cause prejudice to companies and their shareholders, as they may give the related party the opportunity to appropriate value belonging to the company. Thus, adequate safeguards for the protection of shareholders’ interests are of importance. For this reason Member States should ensure that related party transactions representing more than 5 % of the companies’ assets or transactiontransactions with related parties which can have a significant impact on profits or turnover should be submitted to a vote by the shareholders in a general meeting. Where the related party transaction involves a shareholder, this shareholder should be excluded from that vote. The company should not be allowed to conclude the transaction before the shareholders’ approval of the transaction. For significant transactions with related parties that represent more than 1% of their assets companies should publicly announce such transactions at the time of the conclusion of the transaction, and accompany the announcement by a report from an independent third party assessing whether the transaction is on market terms and confirming that the transaction is fair and reasonable from the perspective of the shareholders, including minority shareholders. Member States should be allowed to exclude transactions entered into between the company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Member States should also be able to allow companies to request the advance approval by shareholders for certain clearly defined types of recurrent transactions above 5 percent of the assets, and to request from shareholders an advance exemption from the obligation to produce an independent third party report for recurrent transactions above 1 percent of the assets, under certain conditions, in order to facilitate the conclusion of such transactions by companies.
2015/02/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 2 – point 1
(l) ”Director’ means any member of the administrative, management or supervisory bodies of a company; who participates in the determination or implementation of the policy of a company and who is appointed or elected by the shareholders according to national law.
2015/02/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 3a – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that asset managers disclose upon a half-yearly basisrequest to the institutional investor with which they have entered into the arrangement referred to in Article 3g(2) how their investment strategy and implementation thereof complies with that arrangement and how the investment strategy and implementation thereof contributes to medium to long-term performance of the assets of the institutional investor.
2015/02/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 3h – paragraph 2 – introductory words
2. Member States shall ensure that asset managers disclose to the institutional investor upon a half-yearly basisrequest all of the following information:
2015/02/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1.
1. Member States shall ensure that shareholders have the right to vote on the remuneration policy as regards directors and submit it for approval by the shareholders. Companies shall only pay remuneration to their directors in accordance with a remuneration policy that has been approved by shareholders. TheAny substantial change to the remuneration policy shall be submitted for approval by the shareholders at least every three years.
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Companies may, in case of recruitment of new board members, decide to pay remuneration to an individual director outside the approved policy, where the remuneration package of the individual director has received prior approval by shareholders on the basis of information on the matters referred to in paragraph 3. The remuneration may be awarded provisionally pending approval by the shareholders.deleted
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The policy shall indicate the maximum amounts of total remuneration that can be awarded, and the corresponding relative proportion of the different components of fixed and variable remuneration. It shall explain how the pay and employment conditions of employees of the company were taken into account when setting the policy or directors' remuneration by explaining thMember States may provide that the policy shall set the appropriate ratios between the average remuneration of directors and the average remuneration of full time employees of the company other than directors and why this ratio is considered appropriate. The policy may exceptionally be without a ratio in case of exceptional circumstances. In that case, it shall explain why there is no ratio and which measures with the same effect have been takefixed and variable component of the total remuneration.
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 5
The policy shall explain the decision- making process leading to its determination. Where the policy is revised, it shall include an explanation of all significant changes and how it takes into account the views of shareholders on the policy and report in the previous years.
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9b – paragraph 1 – introductory words
1. Member States shallmay ensure that the company draws up a clear and understandable remuneration report, providing a comprehensive overview of the remuneration, including all benefits in whatever form, granted to individual directors, including to newly recruited and former directors, in the last financial year. It shall, where applicable, contain all of the following elements:
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9b – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the relative change of the remuneration of directors over the last three financial years, and its relation to the development of the value of the company and to change in the average remuneration of full time employees of the company other than directors;
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9b – paragraph 3
3. Member States shallmay ensure that shareholders have the right to vote on the remuneration report of the past financial year during the annual general meeting. Where the shareholders vote against the remuneration report the company shall explain in the next remuneration report whether or not and, if so, how, the vote of the shareholders has been taken into account.
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that companies, in case of significant transactions with related parties that represent more than 1% of their assets, publicly announce such transactions at the time of the conclusion of the transaction, and accompany the announcement by a report from an independent third party assessing whether or not it is on market terms and confirming that the transaction is fair and reasonable from the perspective of the shareholders, including minority shareholders. The announcement shall contain information on the nature of the related party relationship, the name of the related party, the amount of the transaction and any other information necessary to assess the transaction.
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. Member States shall ensure that significant transactions with related parties representing more than 5% of the companies’ assets or transactions which can have a significant impact on profits or turnover are submitted to a vote by the shareholders in a general meeting. Where the related party transaction involves a shareholder, this shareholder shall be excluded from that vote. The company shall not conclude the transaction before the shareholders’ approval of the transaction. The company may however conclude the transaction under the condition of shareholder approval.
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9c – paragraph 3
3. Transactions with the same related party that have been concluded during the previous 12 months period and have not been approved by shareholders shall be aggregated for the purposes of application of paragraph 2. If the value of these aggregated transactions exceeds 5% of the assetssignificance under national law, the transaction by which this threshold is exceeded and any subsequent transactions with the same related party shall be submitted to a shareholder vote and may only be unconditionally concluded after shareholder approval.
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9c – paragraph 3a (new)
3a. Member States shall provide in national law for the definition of significant transactions.
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9c – paragraph 3a (new)
3a. The requirements in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall not apply to transactions entered into in the ordinary course of business or concluded on market terms or market equivalent terms.
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2007/36/EC
Article 9c – paragraph 4a (new)
4a. This Chapter is without prejudice to the provisions laid down in sectorial legislation regulating asset managers and institutional investors and credit institutions to the extent that the requirements provided by this Chapter duplicate or contradict the requirements laid down in sectorial legislation. The provisions of sectorial legislation should be considered as lex specialis in relation to this chapter.
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point a
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point h
(a) In paragraph 1, the following point (h) is added: (h) the remuneration report referred to in Article 9b of Directive 2007/36/EC.deleted
2015/02/25
Committee: JURI