[ParlTrack]

Lucy ANDERSON, Isabelle THOMAS, Jude KIRTON-DARLING, Clare MOODY, Anneliese DODDS, Theresa GRIFFIN, Martina ANDERSON

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18

(18) The Member State or competent public authorit~~ies designated in a Member State~~y should have the choice to decide to provide port services with public service obligations themselves or to entrust directly the provision of such services directly to an internal operator. In the case that a Member State or competent public authority decides to provide the service itself, this may cover the provision of services through agents employed by the competent public authority or commissioned by the competent public authority. When such limitation is applied in all the TEN-T ports in the territory of a Member State, the Commission should be informed. In ~~the cases where the competent authorities in a Member State prevail on such a choice~~such cases, the provision of port services by the internal operators should be confined only to the port or ports for which those internal operators were designated~~. Moreover, in such cases,~~ and the port service charges applied by such an operator should be subject to supervision by the independent supervisory body.

2015/07/02
Committee: TRAN

Lucy ANDERSON, Isabelle THOMAS, Siôn SIMON, Jude KIRTON-DARLING, Clare MOODY, Anneliese DODDS, Theresa GRIFFIN, Olga SEHNALOVÁ, Martina ANDERSON, Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 point a a (new)

(aa) a framework for the protection and recognition of safety, environmental and labour standards and Social Dialogue in the port services industry;

2015/07/02
Committee: TRAN

Lucy ANDERSON, Isabelle THOMAS, Siôn SIMON, Jude KIRTON-DARLING, Clare MOODY, Anneliese DODDS, Theresa GRIFFIN, Martina ANDERSON, Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)

1a. In the event that the managing body of the port does not require minimum requirements, the Member State or competent authority may impose such requirements on the managing body of the port.

2015/07/02
Committee: TRAN

Lucy ANDERSON, Siôn SIMON, Isabelle THOMAS, Jude KIRTON-DARLING, Clare MOODY, Anneliese DODDS, Theresa GRIFFIN, Martina ANDERSON, Olga SEHNALOVÁ, Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY, Ismail ERTUG

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

(c a) social requirements, including but not limited to health and safety obligations, fair terms of employment, decent living and working conditions including social protection and professional training, and the respect of collective bargaining agreements.

2015/07/02
Committee: TRAN

Lucy ANDERSON, Siôn SIMON, Isabelle THOMAS, Jude KIRTON-DARLING, Clare MOODY, Anneliese DODDS, Theresa GRIFFIN, Martina ANDERSON, Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new)

3a. The implementation of this Regulation shall under no circumstances constitute grounds for a reduction in the level of minimum requirements for the provision of port services already afforded by Member States or competent authorities.

2015/07/02
Committee: TRAN

Lucy ANDERSON, Jude KIRTON-DARLING, Clare MOODY, Anneliese DODDS, Theresa GRIFFIN, Martina ANDERSON

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

1. ~~Member States~~In cases where Member States or competent authorities classify port services as being of general interest, they may decide to impose public service obligations related to ~~port~~those services ~~on providers in order to ensure the following:~~, in accordance with principles and requirements of EU law.

2015/07/02
Committee: TRAN

Lucy ANDERSON, Jude KIRTON-DARLING, Clare MOODY, Anneliese DODDS, Richard CORBETT, Theresa GRIFFIN

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)

1a. Where the national legislation of a Member State so permits, the managing body of a port may provide a port service itself or through a legally distinct entity over which it exercises a control similar to that exercised over its own departments. In such a case, the port service provider shall be considered as an internal operator for the purpose of this Regulation.

2015/07/02
Committee: TRAN

Lucy ANDERSON, Jude KIRTON-DARLING, Clare MOODY, Anneliese DODDS, Richard CORBETT, Theresa GRIFFIN

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13

1. The charges for the services provided by an internal operator as referred to in Article 9 and the charges levied by providers of port service, in cases of limitation of the number of providers which have not been designated on the basis of procedures which are open, transparent and non-discriminatory, shall be set in a transparent and non- discriminatory way. These charges shall reflect the conditions on a competitive relevant market and shall not be disproportionate to the economic value of the service provided. 2. The payment of the port service charges may be integrated in other payments, such as the payment of the port infrastructure charges. In this case, the provider of port service and, where appropriate, the managing body of the port shall make sure that the amount of the port service charge remains easily identifiable by the user of the port service. 3. The port service provider shall make available to the competent independent supervisory body as referred to in Article 17, upon request, information on the elements serving as a basis to determine the structure and the level of the port service charges that falls under the application of paragraph 1 of this Article. This information shall include the methodology used for setting the port charges with regard to the facilities and services to which these port service charges relate to.Article 13 deleted Port service charges

2015/07/02
Committee: TRAN

Lucy ANDERSON, Jude KIRTON-DARLING, Clare MOODY, Anneliese DODDS, Richard CORBETT, Theresa GRIFFIN

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14

~~[...]~~deleted

2015/07/02
Committee: TRAN

9 Amendments of Anneliese DODDS related to 2013/0157(COD)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024