12 Amendments of Fredrick FEDERLEY related to 2018/0217(COD)
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. No aAdditional prefinancing shallmay be paid or recovered where a transfer to or from the EAFRD has taken place in accordance with Article 90 of Regulation (EU) …/… [CAP Strategic Plan Regulation].
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 42 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) prior to 1 December but not before 16 October, pay advances of up to 750 % for direct payments interventions;
Amendment 538 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 42 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
In the event of an emergency, the Commission may adopt as soon as possible implementing acts to resolve specific problems in relation to the application of this Article. Those implementing acts may derogate from paragraph 2, but only to the extent that, and for such a period, as is strictly necessary.
Amendment 604 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1
Article 54 – paragraph 1
Sums recovered by the Member States following the occurrence of irregularities and other cases of non-compliance by beneficiaries with the conditions of the interventions referred to in the CAP Strategic Plan and the interest thereon shall be made over to the paying agency and booked by it as revenue assigned to the EAGF in the month in which the sums are actually receivedreallocated as a priority to interventions addressing climate and environmental objective as laid down in Article 28 and 65 and thereafter to interventions addressing boosting competitiveness as laid down in Article 28a of the CAP Strategic Plans regulation.
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 63 – paragraph 2
Article 63 – paragraph 2
2. The integrated system shall apply to the area- and, animal-, or output-based interventions listed in Chapters II and IV of Title III of Regulation (EU) …/… [CAP Strategic Plan Regulation] and to the measures referred to in Chapter IV of Regulation (EU) No 228/201331 and in Chapter IV of Regulation (EU) 229/201332 respectively. _________________ 31 Regulation (EU) No 228/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC) 247/2006 (OJ L 78, 20.3.2013, p. 23). 32 Regulation (EU) No 229/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in favour of the smaller Aegean islands and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1405/2006 (OJ L 78, 20.3.2013, p. 41).
Amendment 663 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Article 64 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(g a) where applicable, a system of monitoring output-based interventions specifically for the interventions in their CAP Strategic Plan according to Regulation (EU) …/…[CAP Strategic Plan Regulation] established by the Member State.
Amendment 741 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 3 – point d
Article 84 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) establish the control sample for the checks referred to in point (a) to be carried out each year on the basis of a risk analysis and shall include a random component and shall provide the control sample to cover at least 1% of beneficiaries receiving the aid provided for in Section 2 of Chapter 1 of Title III of Regulation (EU) …/… [CAP Strategic Plan Regulation]. By way of derogation from the previous point, Member States may decide to reduce the minimum control rate of 0,5 % at the level of each act or standard or group of acts or standards, if the rate of non-compliances found in the random sample checked on the spot shall not exceed 2 % in the preceding two claim years.
Amendment 775 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) shall provide that no administrative penalty be imposed where the non- compliance is due to force majeure.in the following cases:
Amendment 776 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (new)
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (new)
i) where the non-compliance is due to force majeure.
Amendment 777 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (new)
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (new)
ii) where the non-compliance is due to an error of the competent authority or another authority, and where the error could not reasonably have been detected by the person concerned by the administrative penalty.
Amendment 778 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii (new)
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii (new)
iii) where the person concerned can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority that he or she is not at fault for the non-compliance with the obligations referred to in paragraph 1 or if the competent authority is otherwise satisfied that the person concerned is not at fault.
Amendment 829 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 87 – paragraph 1
Article 87 – paragraph 1
Member States may retain 205 % of the amounts resulting from the application of the reductions and exclusions referred to in Article 86in respect of conditionality as referred to in section 2 of Chapter I of Title III of the CAP Strategic Plan Regulation. Member States may retain 100 % of abovementioned amounts under the condition of reallocation as a priority to interventions addressing climate and environmental objective as laid down in Article 28 and 65 and thereafter to interventions addressing boosting competitiveness as laid down article 28a of the CAP Strategic Plans regulation.