5 Amendments of Max ANDERSSON related to 2018/2009(INI)
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas this non-binding exercise has the merits of identifying both positive and negative trends and of offering a forum for peer learning and exchange of best practices across the Union;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas giving information about the justice system in a user-friendly manner is a pre-requisite to access to justice;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that in specific areas of EU law, such as copyright and privacy legislation, the correct and efficient application of the legislation may need understanding of not just the law but also of technological developments; therefore underlines that continuous and systematic training of judges and other legal experts is needed to ensure a coherent and high quality application and efficient enforcement of EU law;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Notes that the specialisation of judges and courts seem to have positive effect on efficiency as well as quality of the justice system; asks the Commission to examine this further in next year's exercise;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Agrees that availability of online information in a user-friendly manner contributes significantly to the accessibility of justice for citizens and businesses; calls on Member States to systematically publish judgments rendered, in particular in Intellectual Property Right cases, to enable and facilitate peer learning and legal and other research and to contribute to the coherent application of EU law;