BETA

7 Amendments of Harald VILIMSKY related to 2020/2136(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas Article 50 guarantees the right of every Member State to withdraw from the European Union in accordance with its national constitutional requirements; whereas this right should be respected and Member States should be able to invoke this right without fear of retaliation or hostile behaviour on the part of the European Union or the other Member States;
2021/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that, as per Article 50(2) TEU, withdrawal agreements are to take account of the framework for the withdrawing state’s future relationship with the Union; emphasises that the withdrawal agreement should be negotiated in good faith by both the EU and the withdrawing Member State; emphasises that the EU should not seek to punish the withdrawing State when negotiating the withdrawal agreement;
2021/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the framework for the future relationship between the EU and the UK was laid down in the Political Declaration accompanying the Withdrawal Agreement, whichUnderstands why the UK did not wish to includes clear provisions established by both parties on cooperatregarding cooperation with the Union in the areas of foreign policy, security and defence;
2021/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets that the legally non- binding nature of the Political Declaration gave the UK legal grounds not to engage with crucial parts of its content, in particular those relating to foreign and security policy, which therefore formed no part of the negotiations;deleted
2021/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. BelievNotes that for the framework on the future relationship between a withdrawing Member State and the Union to inform the withdrawal agreement, its nature must in futurethere are numerous variables that could affect the position of the parties in the time that lapses between the drafting of the withdrawal agreement and that of the framework on the future relationship, which is why the withdrawal agreement cannot be unequivocal, irrevocable and binding on the negotiations on the future relationship upon the entry into force of the relevant withdrawal agreement.
2021/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Regrets that the Commission has initiated infringement proceedings against the UK, a sovereign non-Member State, for an alleged breach of the Northern Ireland Protocol.
2021/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Believes that after a Member State has withdrawn from the European Union, its own judicial system should reign supreme, in accordance with the principle of sovereignty;
2021/03/23
Committee: AFET