4 Amendments of Daniel BUDA related to 2014/2075(DEC)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the Court of Auditors has concluded that as far agricultural policy is concerned, the proportion of tested transactions resulted in an increased error rate as compared to 2012, while conversely, cases that are free of error have gone down; notes that the most likely error rate for 2013 is 3.26% (as compared to 2.9% in 2012); recalls that errors are often administrative in nature and do not necessarily mean that funds have disappeared, been lost or wasted or that fraud has been committed; considers that the priority objective of error identification should be to rectify errors by providing deadlines and support with a view to remedying deficiencies.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Maintains that payments should only be interrupted or suspended in the event of serious deficiencies, and that minor errors should be rectified on a rolling basis in order to avoid gridlock.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the fact that some programmes have attracted less interest owing to their rigidity and suggests that the Commission reassess those programmes with a view to reducing the bureaucracy they involve.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for Union officials to be in charge ofdirectly monitor and coordinate the national paying agencies within the respective Member States, instead of officials of that Member State with the aim of resolving the deficiencies they are experiencing, in particular for those paying agencies that have continuously under-performed over the last three years, with a view to making payments management more efficient;