7 Amendments of Daniel BUDA related to 2015/2326(INI)
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that Parliament should play a more structured role in the analysis of how accession countries and countries with association agreements with the European Union comply with EU law; encourages Parliament in this regard to provide those countries with suitable assistance, in the form of ongoing cooperation with their national parliaments in the field of the observance and application of EU law;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Commission’s 32nd ‘Annual Report on Monitoring the Application of EU Law’, and notes that environment, transport, and internal market and services were the policy areas in 2013 in which most infringement cases remained open in 2014; encourages the Commission, in the interests of ensuring inter-institutional transparency, to afford Parliament better access to cases involving infringements of EU law;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes and reiterates that the increase in the number of new EU Pilot files during the period under examination, and the decrease in the number of open infringement cases, show that enforcement of EU law is neither sufficiently transparent nor subject to any real control by the complainants and the interested parties, and regrets that, despite its repeated requests, Parliament still has inadequate access to information about the EU Pilot procedure and pending cases; calls on the Commission, in this regard, to ensure greater transparency in respect of information on the EU Pilot procedure, and on pending cases;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that, in its resolution of 15 January 2013, Parliament called for the adoption of an EU regulation on a European law of administrative procedure under Article 298 TFEU, but that, despite the fact that the resolution was adopted by an overwhelming majority (572 in favour, 16 against, 12 abstentions), Parliament’s request was not followed up by a Commission proposal; calls on the Commission to re-examine Parliament's resolution with a view to bringing forward a proposal for a legislative act in respect of the law of administrative procedure;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses the need for Member States to provide notification in the event of their introducing national rules supplementing European directives, with a view to resolving the issue of the gold-plating of EU directives with national rules;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that the intent of this draft regulation is not to replace existing EU legislation, but rather to supplement this when there are gaps or problems arise regarding interpretation, and to bring more accessibility, clarity and coherence to the interpretation of existing rules, for the benefit of citizens and businesses and of the administration and its officials;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls, therefore, once more on the Commission to come forward with a legislative proposal on a European Llaw of administrative procedure, taking into account the steps taken so far by Parliament in this field;