BETA

7 Amendments of Daniel BUDA related to 2016/0400(COD)

Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part XII – point 166 – paragraph 1
In order to achieve the objectives of Regulation (EC) No 767/2009, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission to amend the Annexes to that Regulation in order to adapt them to technical progress, update the list of intended uses and set the maximum content of chemical impurities and to supplement that Regulation with a list of categories of feed materials and clarification whether a certain product constitutes feed. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
2017/06/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part XII – point 166 – paragraph 2
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 767/2009, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in order to clarify whether a certain product constitutes feed, updating the list of intended uses and setting the maximum content of chemical impurities. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.deleted
2017/06/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Treaty of Lisbon introduced ahas substantially modified the legal framework governing the powers conferred on the Commission by the legislator, introducing a clear distinction between powers delegated to the Commission to adopt non-legislative acts of general application to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of a legislative act (delegated acts), and the powers conferred upon the Commission to adopt acts to ensure uniform conditions for implementing legally binding Union acts (implementing acts).
2017/12/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Earlier proposals relating to theIn 2013, the Commission brought forward three legislative proposals (Omnibus I, II and III) for the horizontal alignment of legislation referring to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny with the legal framework introduced by the Lisbon Treaty18we. The Council refused to support these Commission proposals, which were therefore withdrawn19 due to the stagnation of the interinstitutional negotiations. _________________ 18 COM(2013) 451 final, COM(2013) 452 final and COM(2013) 751 final 19 (2015/C 80/08), OJ C 80 of 7.02.2015, p. 17.
2017/12/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission subsequently agreed on a new framework for delegated acts in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201620 and acknowledged the need to align all existing legislation to the legal framework introduced by the Lisbon Treaty. In particular, they agreed on the need to give high priority to the prompt alignment of all basic acts which still refer to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny. The Interinstitutional Agreement, and more specifically the Common Understanding on delegated acts annexed thereto, is helping to improve the framework for delegated acts by providing for a clear commitment to systematic consultation of experts from the Member States in the preparation of delegated acts, including the draft text, and is hence fulfilling a key condition for the success of the second attempt to align the old RPS provisions with the Lisbon Treaty. The Commission gave a commitment to prepare a proposal for that alignment by the end of 2016. _________________ 20 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1. OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
2017/12/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Other empowerments in basic acts which provide for the use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny fulfil, on an exceptional basis, the criteria in Article 291(2) of the TFEU and should be adapted to that provision, where there is specific and sound justification for this.
2017/12/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) Bundling and introducing empowerments that are not closely linked to one other within a single Commission delegated act prevents Parliament from exercising its right of scrutiny, as it is forced to simply accept or refuse the entire package and cannot express an opinion on each empowerment individually.
2017/12/19
Committee: JURI