9 Amendments of Daniel BUDA related to 2020/2015(INI)
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas Article 118 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union stipulates that the Union legislator must establish measures for the creation of European intellectual property rights (IPRs) to provide uniform protection of those rights throughout the Union; whereas the single market is conducive to the stronger economic growth needed to ensure the prosperity of European citizens; whereas the development of the digital single market will ensure a high degree of digitalisation in the Union after 2020, with the aim of making Europe a world leader in the field of artificial intelligence;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the regulatory provisions governing artificial intelligence systems should underpin confidence in their safety, reliability and consistency, continuing to strike a balance between public protection on the one hand and business incentives for investment in innovation, specially AI, on the other;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the EU is the appropriate level at which to regulate AI technologies in order to avoid a mere sequence of national regulatory provisions with no common guidelines, leading to fragmentation of the single market; whereas the EU regulatory framework in the field of AI will have the potential to become a legislative benchmark at international level;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas it is necessary to ensure that legislation takes account of the multidimensional nature of artificial intelligence and especially the need to stimulate investment in IA systems to ensure their long-term viability;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of protecting IPRs in relation to AI technologies and their multidimensional character, in order to create the legal certainty and build the trust needed to encourage investment in these technologies; considers that the EU can be achieve its aim to become a frontrunner in the creation of AI technologies if it adopts an operational regulatory framework that is regularly assessed in the light of technological developments and implements proactive public policies, particularly as regards training programmes and financial support for research; reiterates the need, in this regard, to ensure sufficient leeway for the development of new technologies, products or services;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers also that the Union must address the various aspects of AI by means of a definition that is technologically neutral and sufficiently flexible to encompass future technological developments; considers it necessary to continue to reflect on interactions between AI and intellectual property rights, from the perspective of both intellectual property offices and users;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out that IPR protection provisions must be consistent with algorithmic transparency requirements (especially in the case of high-risk AI) and, at the same time, the protection of trade secrets;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recommends that priority be given to assessment by sector and type of IPR implications of AI technologies; considers that such an approach should take into account the degree of human intervention, the importance of the role of the data used and the possible involvement of other factors, such as sectoral economic equilibria; takes the view that more thorough research is necessary for the purposes of evaluating human input regarding AI algorithmic data;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the importance of full implementation of the Digital Single Market Strategy in order to improve data accessibility in the EU; stresses the need to assess in that connection whether EU rules on intellectual property are capable of protecting the data needed for the development of AI; points out that continued in-depth analysis is needed to legally establish the intellectual property of sectoral data not relating to 'inventions' in the generally accepted sense; considers that comprehensive information should be provided on the use of data protected by IPRs, in particular in the context of platform-to-business relationships;