BETA

49 Amendments of Paul TANG related to 2019/2131(INI)

Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
- having regard to the Preliminary Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor of 26 March 2014 on ‘Privacy and competitiveness in the age of big data: The interplay between data protection, competition law and consumer protection in the Digital Economy’ and the Opinion 8/2016 of the European Data Protection Opinion of 23 September 2016 on ‘Coherent enforcement of fundamental rights in the age of big data’;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 b (new)
- having regard to the Statement of the European Data Protection Board of 29 August 2018 on the data protection impacts of economic concentration;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas competition policy must be tailored to tackle digital, ecological, industrial and social challenges, in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement and the EU green deal priority;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
B b. whereas European competition authorities should be equally attentive to avoid under-enforcement in digital markets as they are wary of over- enforcement;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Draws the Commission’s attention to companies benefitting from favourable treatment in their home market entering European markets, thus distorting competition in those various markets; Calls on the Commission to increase scrutiny of investments by entrants from countries granting advantages not available to European operators to combat unfair practices;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 56 #
3. Calls on the Commission to ensure reciprocity with third countries in public procurement and in investment policy, state aid, data protection and investment policy; all while paying particular attention to those least developed countries, which should not be harmed due to their inability to fulfil the reciprocity requirements;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Calls the Commission to strictly safeguard fair competition, level playing field and equal treatment by the dominant platforms operating and making huge profits in the EU 500 million consumers digital single market;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to ensure the balanced application of State aid control to European operators in order to avoid asymmetries with their foreign competitors, who are not subject to itat state aid control is applied equally to European and non-European operators and to prevent distortion of competition by firms receiving government subsidies abroad;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 78 #
6. Calls on the Commission to adopt a more favourable approach to industrial cooperation in order to foster the emergence of European leaders that are globally competitive;deleted
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to adopt a more favourable approach to industrialbusiness cooperation in order to foster the emergence of European leaders that are globally competitive; notes however that clear rules are needed in this regard so that this does not come at the expense of EU citizens’ financial or consumer interests, so that start-ups, newcomers and innovation have a level playing field to enter the market and that this does not trigger any dominant or market abuse position;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls forWelcomes the Commission launch of a review of the definition of the relevant market in the Commission’s merger and antitrust enforcement (Market Definition Notice), so as to move towards a longer- term vision encompassing the global dimension, digital markets and potential future competition; highlights the need for particular attention to be given to zero price markets and multi-sided markets;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Reiterates the importance of social objectives in our competition policy; believes that where suppliers of goods or services lack market power vis-a-vis purchasers, as is the case with many self- employed contractors, this can be remedied by coordinated pricing;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to review merger rules and strengthen antitrust action, taking into account the effects of market and network power on individuals, society and democratic values associated with both personal and financial data; proposes that every merger in the market for such data should be subject to prior monitoring, regardless of thresholds;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Stresses that EU Competition rule should be reviewed in order to look into data concentration, aggregation and utilisation; when assessing digital antitrust and mergers, data utilisation1a by dominant platforms should also be looked at understanding potential negative affects on competition for new companies trying to enter and compete on a specific market; notes that the Commission should learn lessons from the past for example when they approved Facebook What’s- App2a acquisition and adapt their tools and criteria accordingly; _________________ 1ahttps://edps.europa.eu/press- publications/press-news/blog/sharing- caring-depends_en 2a https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/ cases/decisions/m7217_20141003_20310_ 3962132_EN.pdf
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Stresses that, by enabling personalised micro-targeted advertisements personal and behavourial data provide an important source of revenue for platforms; considers that such micro-targeting puts market power in the hands of the few platforms holding most personal data and, when it concerns political advertisements, endangers the functioning of our democracy by strengthening echo chambers and; calls on the Commission to draft legislation that severely constrains personalized and behavioural targeted advertisement;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that the buying-out of start- ups by dominant players dries up innovation and threatens sovereignty, and calls on the Commission to reverse the burden of proof with regard to such buy- outs and to take into account transaction value as part of merger thresholds;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Recalls that abuse of market power can take place even when products or services are supplied for free; believes that the passing on of private data to third parties for marketing or commercial purposes is frequently done without the consumer’s proper consent, as alternatives to sharing data are often not provided; considers that in the digital economy, the concentration of data in a small number of companies leads to market failures, excessive rent extraction and a blocking of new entrants; calls on the Commission to consider the structural unbundling of digital monopolies to restore competition and a level playing field in the European digital market;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Asks the Commission to assess how more demanding regimes of data access, including data interoperability, can be imposed in particular where data access opens up secondary markets for complementary services or when data is confined to dominant firms;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Stresses that concentration in digital markets for example for social media in favour of a few non-European companies has contributed to the dissemination of misinformation, online manipulation and the undermining of social cohesion and trust in democratic institutions;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Draws the Commission’s attention to recent acquisitions by foreign monopolies of digital operators of health and educational data and the privacy risks involved, over and above the damaging effects of these transactions on competition and calls on the Commission to prevent competition amongst companies to gather personal health and educational data;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on the Commission to work out European best practice "data ethics guidelines" for companies and businesses to apply and implement into their business model;underlines that such data ethics would be complementary to data protection rules, and would increase consumer safety and trust;proposes that these EU data ethics guidelines include as key principles amongst others: a) Transparency - The consumer is fully informed about and co-controls which datais being used and whether these are correct - Transparency as to whether the company shares data with public authorities or any business partners b) Data safety - Consumers must be reassured that data kept remain safe;therefore cooperation across the board on data safety needs to be prioritised - A clause on not selling data to third parties should likewise form a key element
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses that, while intermediation platforms play a major role in access to consumers for online services, some abuse their privileged position by acting as gatekeepers; calls on the Commission to conclude its preliminary investigation into Spotify’s complaint about Apple’s anticompetitive practices and to launch a formal procedure as soon as possible; moreover notes that the behaviour of powerful digital platforms is jeopardising competition law in that they often act as bottlenecks for third-party services and favour their own services, preventing consumers from benefiting from unfettered competition and innovation; notes furthermore that the Commission has received a series of complaints that big digital platforms prevent their direct competitors from offering consumers their best deals and from directly communicating with their customers, and make it difficult for consumers to use rival services; expects the Commission to act urgently to stop these discriminatory practices;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses that, while intermediation platforms play a major role in access to consumers for online services, some abuse their privileged position by acting as gatekeepers; calls on the Commission to give explicit attention in its competition policy to these gatekeepers and to conclude its preliminary investigation into Spotify’s complaint about Apple’s anticompetitive practices and to launch a formal procedure as soon as possible;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Notes that some dominant platforms have become gatekeepers of the Internet1a; addressing and solving urgently the abuses that certain dominant digital platforms exercise over smaller direct competitors is essential for the future of the European digital single market and most importantly in the interest of European consumers; platforms self-preferencing their own services over others or discriminating direct competitors such as competing Apps should be carefully assessed by competition authorities; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/information_society/ newsroom/image/document/2016- 7/uclouvain_et_universit_saint_louis_140 44.pdf
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13 b. Recalls that the online search market is of particular importance in ensuring competitive conditions within the digital single market; regrets that one search engine with over 92% of market share in the online search market in most European Member States has become a gatekeeper of the Internet; calls for the input from all stakeholders, from the past 9 years of antitrust history, to be used to urgently assess if remedies proposed truly benefit consumers, internet users and online businesses in the long run; calls also on the Commission to consider a proposal aimed at unbundling search engines1a from their commercial services to end the status quo and as one potential long-term means of achieving fair and effective competition in the European digital market; _________________ 1a https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/TA-8-2014-0071_EN.html
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Points out that the heavy fines imposed are often discounted in advance by businesses and ultimately passed on to consumers; calls on the Commission to impose a new framework for fines, including the possibility of data fines which obliges companies to open source a specific percentage of their raw anonymised data in order to generate more competition;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 212 #
15 a. Notes also that in lengthy antitrust digital cases, fines have proven their limits in putting an end to certain discriminatory practices; underlines that fines are simply a calculated cost of doing business for dominant technology companies that see the European single market as a market worth paying for; urges the Commission to urgently look at alternative behavioural and structural remedies; in particular the cease-and- desist order should be much more prescriptive in upcoming remedies;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15 b. Welcomes the initiative of Commissioner Vestager to review the market definition concept; recalls that digitisation has indeed created new challenges; stresses that it can be difficult for consumers to switch from one ecosystem to another despite a specific ecosystem is not dominant apparently, however the ecosystems can leave consumers locked in, interoperability reduced and therefore consumer choices limited1a; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publicati ons/reports/kd0419345enn.pdf
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15 c. Calls on the Commission to take a particularly careful look at closed ecosystems, where the same providers control different layers of the market, such as operating systems, intermediation services and vertical services, as also underlined in the report “Competition policy for the digital era”1a; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publicati ons/reports/kd0419345enn.pdf
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses the slowness of the application of antitrust rules; stresses the financial and structural risk to which some actors are exposed if they initiate lengthy and costly proceedings; calls on the Commission to consider setting deadlines which take into account the economic timeframe of businesses; recalls that for example the antitrust investigation into the Google Shopping began in 20101a, while fully guaranteeing the right of defence, clearly competition authorities need to act faster if we want to avoid further Regulations; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publicati ons/annual_report/2017/part1_en.pdf
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Urges the Commission to be more attentive to the phenomenon of companies grabbing significant market shares through questionable practices; whilst antitrust rules cannot stop companies from exploiting workers, operating without the required licenses, ignoring data privacy regulations, or circumventing taxes, any position built on violating the law or fundamental rights should be considered illegitimate;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Deplores the fact that, despite repeated requests, the Commission has still not completed the investigation into Google Shopping which began in 2010; stresses that, in the absence of targeted and effective behavioural remedies that have been tested in advance with the undertaking which is the victim, a complete structural separation of general and specialised research services may be necessary; Given the limits of "cease and desist" orders; encourages the Commission to prescribe an effective behavioural remedy to address the abuse in Google Shopping1a and restore competition to the comparison shopping services market; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publicati ons/annual_report/2017/part1_en.pdf
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls on the European Commission to revise its policy when it comes to commitments and remedies in digital antitrust cases; calls for the cease- and-desist order to be revised, become much more prescriptive and include obligations and indications in order to change discriminatory conducts;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Reaffirms the need for the EC Directorate General for Competition to be fully equipped also with experts on artificial intelligence and tech engineer’s specialists in order to fully understand and evaluate the remedies that are presented by the dominant technology companies with the aim to ensure fair competition in the digital sector;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates that taxation is sometimes used to grant indirect State aid, creating an uneven playing field in the internal market; and promulgating a race to the bottom in corporate taxation levels; calls upon the Commission to be particularly strict in investigating tax benefits to multinational corporations;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates that taxation is sometimes usedDeplores the usage of tax rulings and advanced pricing arrangements to grant indirect State aid, creating an uneven playing field in the internal market;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Stresses that in order to achieve a more coherent EU economic policy; fair tax policy should be implemented at the European level in particular with regard to digital businesses; recalls the principle that companies should be taxed where their profits are generated should be applied; supports the commitment of the Commission President to propose an EU solution for a fair taxation in a digitalised and globalised economy, should an international deal not be reached by the end of 2020, on the condition that this EU solution is not limited to digital businesses; understands that such solution would strengthen the Single Market through the establishment of a minimum level of tax that would prevent unilateral measures;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to fully mobilise the state aid modernisation strategy, in particular for the energy transition and apply flexibility when Member States will want to give state aid to companies for green sustainable projects trying to achieve EU green deal targets, in particular for the energy transition and taking into account the EU Green Deal; stresses the need for the Commission to also monitor potential negative side-effects where certain big companies will go “green” but then use public aid for other objectives such as reinforcing its dominant position in a given sector;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. With regard to the food sector, calls on the Commission to guarantee fair competition and greater transparency in supermarket and hypermarkets chains commercial practices; European farmers should receive a fair price for their products; stresses the need for the Commission to look at hypermarkets powers in the distribution chain and commercial practices in placing competing products on the shelves;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission to examine the discrepancies between the rules on State aid in the area of liquidation aid and the resolution regime under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, and following that to revise its 2013 Banking Communication accordingly; taking into account the need to allow for the orderly resolutions for struggling, systemically important banks;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 300 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22 b. Calls on the Commission to bring forward a proposal requiring competition, data protection and consumer authorities to cooperate proactively with each other, including in enforcement cases raising questions of compliance with more than one area of law; in particular, the competition authorities should carefully assess antitrust and merger cases where there may be negative impact on both the interests of consumers and the democratic rights of citizens;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 308 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to report regularly to Parliament and on its website on the implementation and monitoring of cooperation agreements with reference to competition and to involve it in its international activity;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 310 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. Insists on a more regular and transparent exchange with Directorate General for competition and its responsible Commissioner beside the existing structural dialogue inter- institutional agreement; notes that the Economic committee competition working group could be an appropriate place for a deeper and more detailed cooperation; stresses that the European Parliament representing directly the500 million EU citizens should be considered a privilege partner for the Commission, precisely because competition has consumers at its heart;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 316 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses the desire for a greater role for Parliament in determining and developing competition policy, along the lines of that played by the US Congress, which even has the power to launch investigations;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 324 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Commission to organise multisectoral and interinstitutional forums involving national regulators and national consumerincluding data protection authorities and national consumer groups and civil liberties groups and to decompartmentalise competition policy;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 325 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Commission to organise multisectoral and interinstitutional forums involving national regulators and national consumer groups and mediators of individual data (such as union-like organizations) to decompartmentalise competition policy;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 327 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27 a. Stresses that the current complaint form for state aid cases asks for many specific details on when state aid has been accorded, which ordinary citizens can’t possibly know and therefore calls on the Commission to simplify the complaint form, in order to give ordinary citizens the possibility to send in complaints;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 329 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b (new)
27 b. Regrets the lack of information provided during the Commission’s investigation of submitted complaints; calls on the Commission to give the complainant a confirmation of receipt as well as a notification upon the launch of the investigation, including an expectation of the length of the investigation;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 332 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Recognizes that preventing distortion of competition as the paramount objective of EU competition policy requires a measure of political independence for the Commission and public scrutiny of lobbying efforts in all EU institutions, reiterates calls for an enhanced Transparency Register;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON