BETA

11 Amendments of Paul TANG related to 2022/0154(CNS)

Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Member States’ tax systems allow the taxpayers to deduct interest payments on debt financing, and thereby reduce the corporate income tax liability, while costs related to equity financing are non-tax deductible in most Member States. The asymmetric tax treatment of debt and equity financing across the Union induces a bias towards debt in investment decisions. Moreover, where Member States provide for a tax allowance on equity financing in their domestic law, such national measures differ significantly in terms of policy design. By adopting this Directive, the Union answers the call by Parliament to address the tax-related debt-equity bias, including by reducing the interest deduction possibilities. 14a _________________ 14a Resolution of the European Parliament of 15 February 2022 on the impact of national tax reforms on the EU economy (2021/2074(INI)) (OJ C 342, 6.9.2022, p. 14).
2023/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) In order to remove possible tax related distortions among Member States, it is necessary to lay down a common framework of rules to address the tax related debt-equity bias across the Union in a coordinated manner. Such rules should ensure that equity and debt financing are treated in a similar way for tax purposes across the single market. At the same time, athe tax deductibility of debt and/or the creation of an allowance on increases in equity has a negative impact on public revenues. A common Union legislative framework should be sustainable also in the short term for Member States’ budgets. Such framework should therefore include rules, on the one hand, for the tax deductibility of equity financing costs and, on the other, for limiting the tax deductibility of debt financing costs.
2023/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) To neutralise the bias against equity financing, an allowance should be envisaged so that increases in a taxpayer's equity from one tax period to the next are deductible from its taxable base, subject to certain conditions. The allowance should be calculated by multiplying half of the increase in equity with a notional interest rate based on risk-free interest rate as laid down in the implementing acts adopted pursuant to Article 77e(2) of Directive 2009/138/EC. Such risk-free interest rates are already part of EU law and have been practically and effectively applied as such. Any part of the allowance that cannot be deducted in a tax period due to insufficient taxable profits may be carried forward. Taking into account the specific challenges that small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face in accessing capital markets, an increased allowance on equity should be envisaged for taxpayers that are SMEs. In order for the deduction of an allowance on equity to be sustainable for public finances in the short term, it should be limited in time. To safeguard the system from abuses, it is necessary to exclude the tax value of a taxpayer's own shares as well as that of its participation in associated enterprises from the calculation of changes in equity. In the same vein, it is necessary to provide for the taxation of a decrease in a taxpayer’s equity from one tax period to the following one, to prevent an equity increase from being effected in an abusive manner. Such a rule would also encourage the retention of a level of equity. It would apply so that where there is a decrease in equity of a taxpayer that has benefitted from an allowance on equity increase, an amount calculated in the same way as the allowance would become taxable for 10 tax periods; unless the taxpayer provides evidence that this decrease is exclusively due to losses incurred during the tax period or due to a legal obligation.
2023/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
An allowance on equity shall be deductible, for 105 consecutive tax periods, from the taxable base of a taxpayer for corporate income tax purposes, who is a SME or a medium-sized group, for corporate income tax purposes. The sum of the allowance and the deduction for interest rates is deductible up to 30% of the taxpayer's earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (“EBITDA ”).
2023/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
If the deductible allowance on equity, in accordance with the first subparagraph, is higher than the taxpayer’s net taxable income in a tax period, Member States shall ensure that the taxpayer may carry forward, without time limitation, the excess of allowance on equity to the following periods.deleted
2023/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Member States shall ensure that the taxpayers may carry forward, for a maximum of 5 tax periods, the part of the allowance on equity which exceeds 30% of EBITDA in a tax period.deleted
2023/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The allowance on equity shall be equal to half of the base of the allowance multiplied by the 10-year risk-free interest rate for the relevant currency and increased by a risk premium of 1% or, where the taxpayer is an SME, a risk premium of 1.5%.
2023/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The allowance on equity shall be equal to half of the base of the allowance multiplied by the 10-year risk-free interest rate for the relevant currency and increased by a risk premium of 1% or, where the taxpayer is an SME, a risk premium of 1.5%.
2023/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. If, after having obtained an allowance on equity, the base of the allowance on equity is negative in a tax period, an amount equal to the negative allowance on equity shall become taxable for 105 consecutive tax periods, up to the overall increase of net equity for which such allowance has been obtained under this Directive, unless the taxpayer provides sufficient evidence that this is due to accounting losses incurred during the tax period or due to a legal obligation to reduce capital.
2023/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that a taxpayer is able to deduct from its taxable base for corporate income tax purposes exceeding borrowing costs as defined in Article 1, point (2), of Council Directive (EU) 2016/116435 up to an amount (a) corresponding to 850% of such costs incurred during the tax period. If such amount is higher than the amount (b) determined in accordance with Article 4 of Directive (EU) 2016/1164, Member States shall ensure that the taxpayer be entitled to deduct only the lower of the two amounts in the tax period. The difference between the two amounts (a) and (b) shall be carried forward or back in accordance with Article 4 of Directive (EU) 2016/1164. _________________ 35 Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market (OJ L 193, 19.7.2016, p. 1).
2023/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 a (new)
Article 10 a Cost Assessment Before transposing this Directive in accordance with article 11, Member States shall make public an assessment of the foreseen costs of the measures and the resulting decrease in the effective tax rate for corporates. In case of an expected decrease in the effective tax rate of more than 5%, the Member State shall accompany the transposition of this Directive with measures to maintain the effective tax rate at the existing level.
2023/01/19
Committee: ECON