5 Amendments of Paul TANG related to 2023/0177(COD)
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) To ensure a higher-level transparency, ESG rating providers should disclose information to the public on the methodologies, models and key rating assumptions which those providers use in their ESG rating activities and in each of their ESG ratings product. In light of the uses of ESG ratings by investors, they should, to the greatest extent possible, take into account all relevant information, in each of the materiality dimensions, on sustainability matters falling within the scope of the rated entity’s activities. As a result, the rating products should explicitly disclose whicaddress both dimensions of the double materiality, the rating addresses, whether it is boat is, both the material financial risk to the rated entity and the material impact of the rated entity on the environment and society in general or whether it takes into account only one. On the one hand, an impact dimension pertains to the undertaking’s material actual or potential, positive or negative impacts on people or the environment over the short-, medium- and long-term. Impacts include those connected with the undertaking’s own operations and upstream and downstream value chain, including through its products and services, as well as through its business relationships, as defined in the delegated act supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU. On the other hand, a financial dimension should be considered if it triggers or could reasonably be expected to trigger material financial effects ofn them. They undertaking. This is the case when a sustainability matter generates or may generate risks or opportunities that have a material influence, or could reasonably be expected to have a material influence, on the undertaking's development, financial position, financial performance, cash flows, access to finance or cost of capital over the short-, medium- or long-term. ESG rating providers should also explicitly disclose whether the rating addresses other dimensions. For the same reason, ESG rating providers should provide more detailed information on the methodologies, models and key rating assumptions to subscribers of ESG ratings. That information should enable users of ESG ratings to perform their own due diligence when assessing whether to rely or not on those ESG ratings. Disclosure of information concerning models should however not reveal sensitive business information or impede innovation.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission mayshall, where applicable, adopt an implementing decision stating that the legal framework and supervisory practice of a third country ensures that:
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Third country ESG rating providers that wish to be recognised as referred to in paragraph 1 shall comply with the requirements established in this Regulation and apply for recognition to ESMA. ESG rating providers may fulfil that condition by applying the IOSCO recommendations on ESG ratings provided that such application is equivalent to compliance with the requirements established in this Regulation and, for the ESG rating of the undertakings in the scope of Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, that it takes into account information of the rated entity’s activities on sustainability matters, as defined in Article 2, subparagraph b, point 17 of Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for each of the materiality dimensions.
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 a (new)
Article 16 a (new)
Article16a Use of multiple ESG rating providers 1. Where an entity or investor seeks an ESG rating from at least two ESG rating providers, it shall appoint at least one ESG rating provider with no more than 5 % market share in the Union. 2. ESMA shall annually publish on its website a list of ESG rating providers listed in the register referred to in Article 13(1), indicating their total market share in the Union. 3. For the purposes of this Article, total market share shall be measured by reference to the annual turnover generated from ESG rating activities and ancillary services, at group level in the Union.
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1
In carrying out their duties under this Regulation, ESMA, the Commission or any public authorities of a Member State shall not interfere with the content of ESG ratings or methodologies, provided the latter two comply with the obligations laid down in this Regulation.