BETA

5 Amendments of Annie SCHREIJER-PIERIK related to 2015/0289(COD)

Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Procedures should be transparent, practicable and predictable for Union and third country operators, as well as for their respective competent authorities.
2016/09/27
Committee: PECH
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the operator and the fishing vessel have not been subject to a sanction for a serious infringement according to the national law of the Member State pursuant to Article 42 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 and Article 90 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 during the 12 months prior to the application for the fishing authorisation;deleted
2016/09/27
Committee: PECH
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) in a third country which became identified orand listed as a non-cooperating country in combatting IUU fishing pursuant to Articles 31 and 33 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008; or
2016/09/27
Committee: PECH
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Upon a request from the Commission, a flag Member State shall refuse, suspend or withdraw the authorisation in cases of overriding policy reasons pertaining to the sustainable exploitation, management and conservation of marine biological resources or the prevention or suppression of illegal, unreported or unregulated fishing, or in cases where the Union has decided to suspend or sever relations with the third country concerned.
2016/09/27
Committee: PECH
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the operator has paid all fees and financial penalties claimed by the third country competent authority over the past 12 months, on condition that the third country concerned itself fully complies with its obligations under the sustainable fisheries partnership agreement in force.
2016/09/27
Committee: PECH