BETA

15 Amendments of Annie SCHREIJER-PIERIK related to 2018/0210(COD)

Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The landing obligation is one of the main challenges of the CFP. It has implied significant changes in fishing practices for the sector, sometimes with an important financial cost. It should therefore be possible for the EMFF to provide maximum support for innovation and investments that contribute to the implementation of the landing obligation, with a substantially higher aid intensity rate than the one that applies to other operations, like investments in innovative selective fishing gears, in the improvement of port infrastructures and in the marketing of unwanted catches. It should also grant a maximum aid intensity rate of 100% to the design, development, monitoring, evaluation and management of transparent systems for exchanging fishing opportunities between Member States ('quota swaps'), in order to mitigate the 'choke species' effect caused by the landing obligation.
2018/10/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) It should be possible for the EMFF to support the promotion and the sustainable development of aquaculture, including freshwater aquaculture and protection of aquaculture against invasive species and diseases, for the farming of aquatic animals and plants for the production of food and other raw material. CExcessively complex administrative procedures in some Member States remain in place, such as difficult access to space and burdensome licensing procedures, which make it unnecessarily difficult for the sector to improve the image and competitiveness of farmed products. Support should be consistent with the multiannual national strategic plans for aquaculture developed on the basis of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. In particular, support for environmental sustainability, productive investments, innovation, control of specific diseases and invasive species which cause serious damage to aquaculture, acquisition of professional skills, improvement of working conditions, compensatory measures providing critical land and nature management services should be eligible. Public health actions, aquaculture stock insurance schemes and animal health and welfare actions should also be eligible. However, in the case of productive investments support should be provided only through financial instruments and through InvestEU, which offer a higher leverage on markets and are therefore more relevant than grants to address the financing challenges of the sector.
2018/10/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 12
(12) 'productive aquaculture investments' means investments in the construction, extension, modernisation, innovation or in the equipment of facilities for aquaculture production;
2018/10/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – point d a (new)
(da) targeted control of invasive alien species which significantly harm the productivity of the aquaculture and fisheries sector;
2018/10/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – point d b (new)
(db) support for research into and use of innovative selective fishing gear throughout the Union, not only but including in accordance with Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013;
2018/10/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – point i
(i) the contribution of the programme to climate change mitigation and adaptation, including by reducing CO2 emissions by means of fuel savings.
2018/10/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The landing obligation is one of the main challenges of the CFP. It has implied significant changes in fishing practices for the sector, sometimes with an important financial cost. It should therefore be possible for the EMFF to give maximum support to innovation and investments that contribute to the implementation of the landing obligation that is strangling the sector, with a much higher aid intensity rate than the one that applies to other operations, like investments in innovative selective fishing gears, in the improvement of port infrastructures and in the marketing of unwanted catches. It should also grant a maximum aid intensity rate of 100% to the design, development, monitoring, evaluation and management of transparent systems for exchanging fishing opportunities between Member States ('quota swaps'), in order to mitigate the 'choke species' effect caused by the landing obligation.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFF may support the promotion of a sustainable aquaculture as provided for in Article 34(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. It may also supportprovide support to tackle specific problems in the sector which are due to invasive alien species and to promote animal health and welfare in aquaculture in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 and Regulation (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council33. _________________ 32 Regulation (EU) No 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health ('Animal Health Law') (OJ L 84, 31.03.2016, p. 1). 33 Regulation (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 laying down provisions for the management of expenditure relating to the food chain, animal health and animal welfare, and relating to plant health and plant reproductive material, amending Council Directives 98/56/EC, 2000/29/EC and 2008/90/EC, Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 882/2004 and (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decisions 66/399/EEC, 76/894/EEC and 2009/470/EC (OJ L 189, 27.06.2014, p. 1).
2018/10/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) Fisheries and aquaculture contribute to food security and nutrition. HoweverUnfortunately, the Union currently imports more than 60% of its supply of fishery products and is therefore highly dependent on third countries. An important challenge is to encourage the consumption of fish protein produced in the Union with high quality standards and available for consumers at affordable prices.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) It should be possible for the EMFF to support the promotion and the sustainable development of aquaculture, including freshwater aquaculture and the protection of aquaculture against invasive species and diseases, for the farming of aquatic animals and plants for the production of food and other raw material. CToo complex administrative procedures in some Member States remain in place, such as difficult access to space and burdensome licensing procedures, which make it unnecessarily difficult for the sector to improve the image and competitiveness of farmed products. Support should be consistent with the multiannual national strategic plans for aquaculture developed on the basis of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. In particular, support for environmental sustainability, productive investments, innovation, control of certain diseases and invasive species that cause considerable damage to aquaculture, acquisition of professional skills, improvement of working conditions, compensatory measures providing critical land and nature management services should be eligible. Public health actions, aquaculture stock insurance schemes and animal health and welfare actions should also be eligible. However, in the case of productive investments support should be provided only through financial instruments and through InvestEU, which offer a higher leverage on markets and are therefore more relevant than grants to address the financing challenges of the sector.
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 12
(12) ‘productive aquaculture investments’ means investments in the construction, extension, modernisation, innovation or in the equipment of facilities for aquaculture production;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – point d
(d) the implementation of the restrictive landing obligation referred to in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – point d a (new)
(da) control of invasive species that cause considerable damage to the productivity of fisheries;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 485 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – point d b (new)
(db) support for the spreading of innovative selective fishing gear throughout the EU, with particular regard for Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013;
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 842 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFF may support the promotion of a sustainable aquaculture as provided for in Article 34(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. It may also support specific issues that occur in the sector due to invasive alien species as well as animal health and welfare in aquaculture in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 and Regulation (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council33. _________________ 32 Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (OJ L 84, 31.3.2016, p. 1). 33 Regulation (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 laying down provisions for the management of expenditure relating to the food chain, animal health and animal welfare, and relating to plant health and plant reproductive material, amending Council Directives 98/56/EC, 2000/29/EC and 2008/90/EC, Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 882/2004 and (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decisions 66/399/EEC, 76/894/EEC and 2009/470/EC (OJ L 189, 27.6.2014, p. 1).
2018/10/25
Committee: PECH