85 Amendments of Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO related to 2018/0196(COD)
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Particular attention should be paid to rural areas, mountain areas, areas hard to reach, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) The decline in the working population in relation to the population as a whole, coupled with an ever-increasing percentage of pensioners, and the problems associated with population dispersion are expected to impose continuing strains, especially on Member States’ education systems and social safety nets and hence on the Union’s economic competitiveness. Adaptation to these demographic shifts is one of the main challenges facing Member States and regions in the years ahead and should accordingly be a focus of particular attention in the regions most affected by demographic change.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) To better mobilise potential at the local level, it is necessary to strengthen and facilitate CLLD. It should take into account local needs and potential, as well as relevant socio-cultural characteristics, and should provide for structural changes, build community capacity, its project management capabilities and stimulate innovation. The close cooperation and integrated use of the Funds to deliver local development strategies should be strengthened. Local action groups, representing the interests of the community, should be, as an essential principle responsible for the design and implementation of CLLD strategies. In order to facilitate coordinated support from different Funds to CLLD strategies and to facilitate their implementation, the use of a 'Lead Fund' approach should be facilitated.
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) In order to reduce the administrative burden, technical assistance at the initiative of the Member State should be implemented through a flat rate based on progress in programme implementation. That technical assistance may be complemented with targeted administrative capacity building measures, such as the evaluation of the skills set of human resources, using reimbursement methods that are not linked to costs. Actions and deliverables as well as corresponding Union payments can be agreed in a roadmap and can lead to payments for results on the ground.
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61 a (new)
Recital 61 a (new)
(61a) According to the statement of reasons for, and objectives of, Regulation (EU) No 2017/2391 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 as regards the territorial typologies, Union cohesion and territorial development policy-makers are calling for a wider range of territorial typology statistics (NUTS) with which to define urban, rural, coastal, and other areas, and Eurostat accordingly needs to be able to establish such statistics as recognised, impartial, and transparent statistical typologies, thus making it possible to examine the major differences between urban and rural areas. These new typologies will make it possible to identify less developed regions, which to date have not been brought to light, because they have been compartmentalised at NUTS level 2.
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) 'specific objective' in the context of the EMFF, shall be understood as 'areas of support' as referred to in Annex III of the EMFF Regulation; in the context of the ERDF, as objectives according to article 2 of the ERDF Regulation; in the context of the ESF+, as objectives according to article 4 of the ESF+ Regulation;
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) a smarter Europe by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation and regional ICT connectivity;
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) a more connected Europe by enhancing mobility and regional ICT connectivity;
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) a more social and equal Europe implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights;
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) Investment for jobs and growth, including strategic infrastructure investments in the Member States and regions most affected, to be supported by the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund, so as to help ensure the necessary public service provision, while improving personal prospects and employment opportunities in the area concerned; and
Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Member States and the Commission shall ensurpromote the coordination, complementarity and coherence between the Funds and other Union instruments such as the Reform Support Programme, including the Reform Delivery Tool and the Technical Support Instrument. They shall optimise mechanisms for coordination between those responsible to avoid duplication during planning and implementation.
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The Member States - at the appropriate territorial level and according to their institutional, legal and financial framework and the authorities named by them for this purpose- and the Commission shall implement the budget of the Union allocated to the Funds under shared management in accordance with Article [63] of Regulation (EU, Euratom) [number of the new financial regulation] (the 'Financial Regulation').
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. However, the Commission shall implement the amount of support from the Cohesion Fund transferred to the Connecting Europe Facility ('CEF'), the European Urban Initiative, Interregional Innovative Investments, the amount of support transferred from the ESF+ to transnational cooperation, the amounts contributed to InvestEU37 and technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission under direct or indirect management in accordance with [points (a) and (c) of Article 62(1)] of the Financial Regulation. _________________ 37 [Regulation (EU) No […] on […] (OJ L […], […], p. […])].
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission may implement outermost regions' cooperation under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) under indirect management, with the prior consent of the Member States and after hearing the views of the outermost regions.
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission may, with the agreement of the Member State, implement outermost regions' cooperation under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) under indirect management.
Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) urbanlocal and other public competent authorities or their representatives and umbrella organisations;
Amendment 510 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) relevant bodies representing beneficiaries and service users.
Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. In accordance with the multi-level governance principle, the Member State shall involve those partners as equal stakeholders in the preparation of Partnership Agreements and throughout the preparation and, implementation and evaluation of programmes including through participation in monitoring committees in accordance with Article 34.
Amendment 535 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The call for participation of the aforementioned stakeholders must be transparent, published on an easy-to- locate, permanent and up-to-date platform that is accessible for persons with disabilities in line with the Web Accessibility Directive.
Amendment 539 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 b (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Member States shall allocate at least 2% of the of ESF+ and ERDF resources for the capacity building of social partners and civil society organisations.
Amendment 540 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 c (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 4 c (new)
4 c. The partnership agreements shall also indicate, where appropriate, an integrated approach to addressing the specific needs of geographical areas most affected by poverty or of target groups at highest risk of discrimination or social exclusion, with special regard to marginalised communities, persons with disabilities, the long term unemployed and young people not in employment, education or training.
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Amendment 564 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 a (new)
Article 7 a (new)
Article 7 a Promotion of equality between men and women and non-discrimination The Member States and the Commission shall ensure that equality between men and women and the integration of gender perspective are taken into account and promoted throughout the preparation and implementation of programmes, including in relation to monitoring, reporting and evaluation. The Member States and the Commission shall take appropriate steps to prevent any discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation during the preparation and implementation of programmes. In particular, accessibility for persons with disabilities shall be taken into account throughout the preparation and implementation of programmes.
Amendment 619 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) a summary of the actions which the Member State concerned shall take to reinforce its administrative capacity of the implementation of the Funds and its management and control of the programmes.
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) where applicable, an integrated approach to address demographic challenges for the regions or the specific needs of geographical areas which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps as referred in Article 174 TFEU.
Amendment 694 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. Where a guarantee agreement, as set out in Article [9] of the [InvestEU Regulation], has not been concluded within nine months from the approval of the contribution agreement, the respective amounts paid into the common provisioning fund as a provisioning shall be transferred back to a programme or programmes and the Member State shall submit a corresponding request for a programme amendment. In this particular case, resources of past calendar years can be modified, as long as the commitments are not yet implemented.
Amendment 750 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. For programmes supported by the ERDF, the ESF+, the EAFRD and the Cohesion Fund, the Member State shall carry out a mid-term review. The Member State and the territorial level in charge of the programme shall review each programme, taking into account the following elements:
Amendment 784 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) the revision of the indicative allocations of the financial resources by priority including the amounts for the years 2026 and 2027;
Amendment 833 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 9
Article 15 – paragraph 9
9. The scope and level of the suspension of commitments or payments to be imposed shall be proportionate, shall respect the equality of treatment between Member States and shall take into account the economic and social circumstances of the Member State concerned, in particular the level of unemployment, the level of poverty or social exclusion of the Member State concerned in relation to the Union average and the impact of the suspension on the economy of the Member State concerned. The impact of suspensions on programmes of critical importance to address adverse structural, economic, or social conditions, such as those in the outermost regions, shall be a specific factor to be taken into account.
Amendment 890 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iii
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iii
(iii) challenges identified in relevant country-specific recommendations, where appropriate, and other relevant Union recommendations addressed to the Member State;
Amendment 897 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iv
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iv
(iv) challenges in administrative capacity and governance, including, where necessary, a summary of the actions taken to address the lack of project management capabilities;
Amendment 952 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point j
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point j
(j) the managing authority, the audit authority, the body responsible for the accounting function under Article 70, and the body which receives payments from the Commission.
Amendment 969 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 6
Article 17 – paragraph 6
6. For ERDF, ESF+ and Cohesion Fund programmes submitted in accordance with Article 16, the table referred to in paragraph (3)(f)(ii) shall include the amounts for the years 2021 to 2025 only7.
Amendment 973 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 a (new)
Article 17 a (new)
Article 17a Programming in areas with severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps In programmes covering areas with severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, as referred to in Article 174 TFEU, particular attention shall be paid to the specific difficulties of those areas. In particular, NUTS level 3 areas or clusters of local administrative units (LAUs) with a population density below 12.5 inhabitants per km2 for sparsely populated areas or below 8 inhabitants per km2 for very sparsely populated areas, or with an average annual population decrease of more than 1% between 2007 and 2017, shall be subject to specific regional and national plans to enhance attractiveness, increase business investment, and promote social inclusion, through preparatory programmes for people living in declining regions, social and digital inclusion for women, young people, and older adults, and digital and public service accessibility, including dedicated funding under the partnership agreement1 a. NUTS level 3 areas where the fall in GDP has been above the national average since 2007 shall also be subject to regional and national plans to enhance economic attractiveness and build capacity within the existing labour force, and build and attract new capacities and workers, which shall be financed by dedicated funding under the partnership agreement. _________________ 1a As called for in the 2012 ESPON study entitled ‘Making the best of Europe’s sparsely populated areas on making geographic specificity a driver for territorial development in Europe’.
Amendment 982 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall assess the programme and its compliance with this Regulation and with the Fund-specific Regulations, as well as its consistency with the Partnership Agreement. In its assessment, the Commission shall, in particular, take into account relevant country-specific recommendations, where appropriate.
Amendment 992 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3
Article 18 – paragraph 3
3. The Member State shall provide to the Commission all necessary additional information and, where appropriate, review the programme taking into account the observations made by the Commission.
Amendment 999 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4
Article 18 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall adopt a decision by means of an implementing act approving the programme no later than sixthree months after the date of submission of the revised version of the programme by the Member State.
Amendment 1015 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall assess the amendment and its compliance with this Regulation and with the Fund-specific Regulations, including requirements at national level, and may make observations within threone months of the submission of the amended programme.
Amendment 1020 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. The Member State shall review the amended programme and take into account, where appropriate, the observations made by the Commission.
Amendment 1027 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
Article 19 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall approve the amendment of a programme no later than sixthree months after its submission by the Member State.
Amendment 1041 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
The Member State may transfer during the programming periodreallocate an amount of up to 510 % of the initial allocation of a priority, which will be 12% for the outermost regions, and no more than 36 % of the programme budget to another priority of the same Fund of the same programme. For the programmes supported by the ERDF and ESF+, the transferreallocation shall only concern allocations for the same category of region.
Amendment 1055 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Such transfers shall not affect previousreallocations could be of retroactive nature as long as there are commitments still available for the affected years. They shall be considered to be not substantial and shall not require a decision of the Commission amending the programme. They shall however, comply with all regulatory requirements. The Member State shall submit to the Commission the revised table referred to under points (f)(ii), (f)(iii) or (f)(iv) of Article 17(3) as applicable.
Amendment 1056 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Consecutive reallocations adopted by the Member State shall not exceed the aforementionned limits referred to the last version of the programme approved by decision of the Commission.
Amendment 1096 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 4
Article 21 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission may object tomake observations on a request for transfer in the related programme amendment where this would undermine the achievement of the objectives of the programme from which the resources are to be transferred.
Amendment 1167 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4
Article 25 – paragraph 4
4. Where the implementation of such a strategy involves support from more than one Fund, the relevant managing authorities may choose one of the Funds concerned as the Lead Fundtype of measures and operations to be financed by each affected Fund must be foreseen.
Amendment 1170 #
5. The rules of the Leadch Fund shall apply to that strategy. The authorities of other funds shall rely on decisions and management verifications made by the competent Lead Fund authoritye operations financed by it. The competent authorities shall be responsible for the adoption of corresponding decisions and management checks.
Amendment 1172 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 6
Article 25 – paragraph 6
6. The authorities of the Leadeach Fund shall provide the authorities of other Fundsjoint committee with the information necessary to monitor and make payments in accordance with the rules set out in the Fund-specific Regulationassess the approved strategy.
Amendment 1179 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the management, monitoring and evaluation arrangements, demonstrating the capacity and the project management capabilities of the local action group to implement that strategy;
Amendment 1197 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) capacity building, where necessary, fostering their project management capabilities, and preparatory actions supporting the design and future implementation of the strategies;
Amendment 1209 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Where an authority or body is responsible for several operative programmes, the expenditure derived from technical assistance functions of one of them can be attributed to the technical axis of any of the others.
Amendment 1219 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) for the ERDF support under the Investment for jobs and growth goal, and for the Cohesion Fund support: 2,5 %3% – and 4% for the Outermost Regions;
Amendment 1242 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for the ESF+ support: 4% and5%; for programmes under Article 4(1)(c)(vii) of the ESF+ Regulation: 5 6%;
Amendment 1245 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) for the EMFF support: 6 % – and 7% for the Outermost Regions;
Amendment 1249 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 (new)
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 (new)
The Member State may use the reimbursed technical assistance amounts under this paragraph in accordance with the agreements adopted among the different bodies responsible for the managements of the Funds. The allocation of the Funds will be subject to Member State budgetary national regulations, without applying the present Regulation.
Amendment 1270 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Member State shall determine the composition of the monitoring committee and shall ensure a balanced representation of the relevant Member State authorities and intermediate bodies and of representatives of the partners referred to in Article 6. Representatives of the partners shall be delegated through transparent processes to be part of the monitoring committee by the respective partners.
Amendment 1303 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The managing authority shall electronically transmit to the Commission cumulative data for each programme by 31 January, 31 March, 31 May, 31 July, 30 SeptemberMay and 30 November of each year in accordance with the template set out in Annex VII.
Amendment 1312 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The first transmission shall be due by 31 JanuarMay 2022 and the last one by 31 January 2030.
Amendment 1374 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where the total cost of an operation does not exceed EUR 200 000, the contribution provided to the beneficiary from the ERDF, the ESF+, the AMIF, the ISF and the BMVI shall take the form of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates, except for operations for which the support constitutes State aid. Where flat-rate financing is used, only the categories of costs to which the flat-rate applies may be reimbursed in accordance withnamed in point (a) of the first sub- paragraph may form the basis for the flat rate.
Amendment 1433 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 6
Article 57 – paragraph 6
6. Operations shall not be selected for support by the Funds where they have been physically completed or fully implemented before the application for funding under the programme is submitted to the managing authority, irrespective of whether all related payments have been made. This provision shall not apply to aid under Article 21 of the EMFF Regulation, concerning compensation for additional costs in outermost regions for fishery and aquaculture products, nor to operations relating to the specific additional allocation for the outermost regions under the ERDF.
Amendment 1446 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For point (b), the limits shall not apply to operations concerning environmental conservation. For point (c),the threshold shall not apply to ESF+ operations targeting disadvantaged groups at risk of social exclusion.
Amendment 1464 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 a (new)
Article 62 a (new)
Amendment 1521 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 67 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 67 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
For the selection of operations, the managing authority shall establish and apply criteria and procedures which are non-discriminatory, transparent, ensure gender equality, ensure accessibility to persons with disabilities and take account of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principle of sustainable development and of the Union policy on the environment in accordance with Articles 11 and 191(1) of the TFEU.
Amendment 1545 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 67 – paragraph 3 – point j a (new)
Article 67 – paragraph 3 – point j a (new)
(ja) ensure that selected operations aim to improve the social inclusion of persons with disabilities by supporting the implementation of accessible infrastructures and services, both physical and digital;
Amendment 1631 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) 2021: 0.51 %;
Amendment 1649 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) 2022: 0.51 %;
Amendment 1674 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) 2023: 0.53 %;
Amendment 1682 #
(d) 2024: 0.2.625 %;
Amendment 1705 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) 2025: 0.2.75 %;
Amendment 1721 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f
(f) 2026: 0.2.875 %
Amendment 1738 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) 2027-2029: 3 %
Amendment 1793 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 1
Article 99 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall decommit any amount in a programme which has not been used for pre-financing in accordance with Article 84 or for which a payment application has not been submitted in accordance with Articles 85 and 86 by 26 December of the seconthird calendar year following the year of the budget commitments for the years 2021 to 2026.
Amendment 1823 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 103 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 103 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
That decision shall also set out the annual breakdown of the global resources per Member State under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg). Therefore, the minimum overall allocation of the Funds, at both national and regional level, shall be equal to 76 % of the budget allocated to each Member State or region during the period 2014- 2020. In any case, no region which is downgraded in category shall receive less than what it receives in the 2014-2020 financial framework.
Amendment 1826 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 103 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 103 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The minimum overall allocation from the Funds, at both national and regional level, should be equal to 76% of the budget allocated to each Member State or region over the 2014-2020 period.
Amendment 1851 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 104 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
To the amount of additional funding for the outermost regions referred to in point (e) in paragraph 1 allocated to the ESF+ shall be EUR 376 928 934and the NUTS level 2 regions that comply with the criteria established in Article 2 of Protocol 6 to the 1994 Act of Accession referred to in point (e) in paragraph 1, the equivalent of 0.4 % of the resources referred to in paragraph 1 (i.e. EUR 424 296 054) shall be added from the ESF+.
Amendment 1922 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) 7085 % for the less developed regions;
Amendment 1935 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) 5570 % for the transition regions;
Amendment 1944 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) 5570 % for the transition regions;
Amendment 1959 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) 450 % for the more developed regions.
Amendment 1963 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) No region that is downgraded in category may have its co-financing rate cut by more than 10 points compared with the period 2014-2020.
Amendment 1965 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The co-financing rates set out underlaid down in point (a), shall also apply to outermost regions and those regions which have depopulation problems (less than 12.5 inhabitants per square kilometre at NUTS 3 level).
Amendment 1987 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 106 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The co-financing rate referred to in objective (xi) of Article [4] of the ESF+ Regulation shall not be less than 85% or more than 100%.
Amendment 1996 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 106 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The co-financing rate for Interreg programmes shall be no higher than 7085 %.
Amendment 2006 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – subheading 1
Annex II – subheading 1
Template for Partnership Agreement - Article 7(4)able 4: Preliminary financial allocation from ERDF, CF, ESF+, EMFF by policy objective*
Amendment 2078 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex XXIV – point 9
Annex XXIV – point 9
9. An additional special allocation corresponding to an aid intensity of EUR 340 per inhabitant per year will be allocated to the outermost NUTS level 2 regions and the northern sparsely populated NUTS level 2 regions. That allocation will be distributed per region and Member State in a manner proportional to the total population of those regions.
Amendment 2084 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex XXIV – point 15 a (new)
Annex XXIV – point 15 a (new)
15a. No region which is downgraded in category shall receive less than what it receives in the 2014-2020 financial framework.