Activities of Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO related to 2014/0185(COD)
Plenary speeches (1)
Interoperability solutions as a means for modernising the public sector (A8-0225/2015 - Carlos Zorrinho) ES
Amendments (8)
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) In its Communication of 19 May 2010 to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on A Digital Agenda for Europe (DAE)35, one of the flagship initiatives of its Europe 202036 Strategy, the Commission stressed that interoperability is essential to maximise the social and economic potential of ICT and that, consequently, the Digital Agenda can take off only if interoperability is ensured in such a way as to comply with the principles and provisions relating to data protection and the protection of privacy. __________________ 35 COM(2010) 245. 36 COM(2010) 2020.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 24 a (new)
Recital 24 a (new)
(24a) The ISA2 Programme should comply with the principles and provisions relating to data protection and the protection of privacy.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 4
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. The evaluations shall examine issues such as compliance with the provisions and principles relating to data protection and the protection of privacy, and the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, utility, sustainability, data protection compliance and coherence of Programme actions. The final evaluation shall, in addition, examine the extent to which the Programme has achieved its objective.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Any form of international cooperation implemented under the ISA2 Programme shall comply with Union principles and provisions relating to data protection and the protection of privacy.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) In a series of Ministerial Declarations (in Manchester on 24 November 2005, Lisbon on 19 September 2007, Malmö on 18 November 2009 and Granada on 19 April 2010), ministers invited the Commission to facilitate cooperation among Member States by implementing cross-border and cross-sector interoperability solutions that will enable more efficient and secure public services. Moreover, Member States recognised that better public services need to be delivered with fewer resources, and that the potential of e-Government can be boosted by promoting a culture of collaboration and improving the conditions for interoperability in European public administrations.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) A single sector interoperability perspective is associated with the risk that the adoption of different or incompatible solutions at national or sectoral levels will throw up new e-barriers that impede the proper functioning of the internal market and the associated freedoms of movement, and undermine the openness and competitivenessgood functioning of markets and the delivery of services of general interest to citizens and enterprises. In order to mitigate this risk, Member States and the Union should step up joint efforts to avoid market fragmentation, the digital divide and ensure cross- border or cross-sector interoperability in the implementation of legislation, while reducing administrative burdens and costsimproving efficiency, and promote commonly agreed ICT solutions, while ensuring appropriate governance.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) The modernisation of public administrations is one of the key priorities for successful implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy. In this context, the Annual Growth Surveys published by the Commission in 2011, 2012 and 2013 show that the quality of European public administrations has a direct impact on the economic environment and is therefore crucial to stimulating productivity, competitivenesseconomic cooperation and growth. This is clearly reflected in the country-specific recommendations, which call for specific action aimed at public administration reform.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 4
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. The evaluations shall examine issues such as the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, utility, citizens´ satisfaction and the sustainability and coherence of Programme actions. The final evaluation shall, in addition, examine the extent to which the Programme has achieved its objective.