[ParlTrack]

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9

(9) The voting rules for the appeal committee should be changed in order to reduce the risk of no opinion being delivered and to provide an incentive for Member State representatives to take a clear position. To this end only Member States which are present or represented, and which do not abstain, should be considered as participating Member States for the calculation of the qualified majority. In order to ensure that the voting outcome is representative a vote should only be considered valid if a simple majority of the Member States are participating members of the appeal committee. If the quorum is not reached before expiry of the time-limit for the committee to take a decision, it will be considered that the committee delivered no opinion, as is the case today.deleted

2017/10/13
Committee: AGRI

Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10

(10) The Commission should have the possibility, in specific cases, to ask the Council and the European Parliament to indicate ~~its~~their views and orientation on the wider implications of the absence of an opinion~~, including the institutional, legal, political and international implications~~. The Commission should take account of any positions expressed by the Council and the European Parliament within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadline in the referral.

2017/10/13
Committee: AGRI

Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a

Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 6 – paragraph 1

a) in paragraph 1, the following second subparagraph is added: "However, only members of the appeal committee who are present or represented at the time of the vote, and do not abstain from voting, shall be considered as participating members of the appeal committee. The majority referred to in Article 5(1) shall be the qualified majority referred to in Article 238(3) (a) TFEU. A vote shall only be considered to be valid if a simple majority of the Member States are participating members.";deleted

2017/10/13
Committee: AGRI

Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b

3a. Where no opinion is delivered in the appeal committee, the Commission may refer the matter to the Council ~~for an opinion indicating its views and orientation on the wider implications of the absence of opinion, including the institutional, legal, political and international implicat~~and the European Parliament for an opinions. The Commission shall take account of any positions expressed by the Council and the European Parliament within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadline in the referral.

2017/10/13
Committee: AGRI

4 Amendments of Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ related to 2017/0035(COD)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024