Activities of Notis MARIAS related to 2017/2044(BUD)
Plenary speeches (3)
2018 budgetary procedure (debate) EL
General budget of the European Union for 2018 - all sections (A8-0299/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan, Richard Ashworth) EL
General budget of the European Union for 2018 - all sections (debate) EL
Amendments (7)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is concernedNotes that insufficient funding for Horizon 2020 has resulted in a low success rate for applications; calls the Commission to respect the breakdown of Horizon 2020 budget as described in Annex II of Regulation (EU) 1291/2013;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the 2018 budget to reflect the priorities outlined in the European Semester, specifically re-launching investment, pursuing structural reforms and conducting responsible fiscal policies;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls to restore the original annual profile of the budget lines for Horizon 2020 and CEF that were cut for the provisioning of the EFSI Guarantee Fund; remindnotes that during the EFSI negotiations the Parliament called to reduce as much as possible the negative impact on these two programmes; is concerned that the proposed extension of EFSI may again weaken Horizon 2020 and CEF;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. WelcomNotes the inclusion of adequate resources in the 2018 budget to support the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs); underlines that the role of the ESAs is essential in fostering the consistent application of Union law and better coordination between national authorities, and in ensuring financial stability, better integrated financial markets and consumer protection; emphasises that the ESAs must stick strictly to the tasks assigned to them by the European Parliament and the Council and must not seek to broaden their mandate beyond those assignments;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that the ESAs should ensure that the IT-systems used are as efficient, user-friendly, secure and cost- effective as possible;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates that the financing of the ESAs should be reviewed; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of introducing calibrated fees for market participants partly replacing the contributions of national competent authorities;