7 Amendments of Notis MARIAS related to 2018/2207(DEC)
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. GDoes not grants the interim director of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology discharge in respect of the implementation of the Institute’s budget for the financial year 2017;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the factNotes that the Institute has conducted joint public procurement procedures and set up common selection committees for the staff with the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training, taking advantage that they are both located in Budapest;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Observes that an external evaluation to assess the impact, governance, processes and progress towards financial sustainability of the first wave of KICs for the period 2010 to 2016 was made in 2017, and during 2018 the Institute will conclude the review; calls on the Institute to report promptly to the discharge authority on the conclusions of this review;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Takes note of the factNotes that it is structurally understaffed, as also endorsed by the Court in their Special Report No 4/2016; notes that the Institute’s requests to significantly increase its staff capacity have been declined by the Commission; calls on the Institute to report to the discharge authority of any developments in this matter;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Regrets to nNotes from the Court’s report that the Institute’s current interim Director was appointed in 2014, and has held the post ever since as ad interim; points out that that practice is at odds with the Staff Regulations which limits the duration to a maximum of one year; regrets that a selection procedure for the nomination for a new Director launched in 2016 was unsuccessful; takes note that a vacancy notice was again published in June 2018; calls on the Institute to report to the discharge authority on the results of the ongoing selection process;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the suggestion of the Court to publish vacancy notices also on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office in order to increase publicity; understands the Institute’s reply concerning the high translation costs triggered by such publication;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes from the Court’s report that by the end of 2017 the Institute had not yet implemented all of the tools launched by the Commission aimed to introduce a single solution for the electronic exchange of information with third parties participating in public procurement procedures (e-procurement); notes from the Institute’s reply that it intends to adopt the e-tendering and e-submission tools, for which preparatory actions are ongoing; calls onurges the Agency to report to the discharge authority on the implementation of all the necessary tools;