BETA

Activities of Georgios EPITIDEIOS related to 2014/0005(COD)

Plenary speeches (3)

Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other treatment or punishment (A8-0267/2015 - Marietje Schaake) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0005(COD)
Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other treatment or punishment (A8-0267/2015 - Marietje Schaake) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0005(COD)
Trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other treatment or punishment (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0005(COD)

Amendments (24)

Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Articles 5, 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 establish an export licensing system designed to prevenohibit the relevant goods from being used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) These measures should not go beyond what is proportionate. They should, therefore, not prevent the export of medicinal products used for legitimate therapeutic purposes: it is sufficient to carry out strict controls for this purpose.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Given the different characteristics of capital punishment, on the one hand, and torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on the other, it is appropriate to establish a specific export licensing system with a view to preavenrting the use of certain goods for capital punishment. Such a system should take into account the fact that a number of countries have abolished capital punishment for all crimes and have made an international commitment on this issue. As there is a risk of re-export to countries that have not done so, certain conditions and requirements should be imposed when authorising exports to countries that have abolished capital punishment. It is, therefore, appropriate to grant a general export authorisation for exports to those countries that have abolished capital punishment for all crimes and confirmed it with an international commitment.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) If a country has not abolished capital punishment in this way, the competent authorities should, when examining a request for an export authorisation, check whether there is a risk that the end-user in the country of destination would use the exported goods for such punishment. AProvision should be made for appropriate conditions and requirements should be imposed to control sales or transfers to third parties by the end-user. If multiple shipments between the same exporter and end-user take place, the competent authorities should be allowed to review the status of the end-user on a periodic basis, e.g. every six months, rather than every time an authorisation is granted, without prejudice to their right to annul, suspend, modify or revoke an export authorisation in accordance with Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 where warranted.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In order to limit the administrative burden for exporters the competent authorities should be allowed to grant an exporter a global authorisation for all shipments of medicinal products from the exporter to a specific end-user during a fixed period of time, specifying a quantity corresponding to the end-user’s normal use of the goods, where deemed necessary. Such authorisation would, in accordance with Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 be valid for not more than twelve months with a possible extension of up to twelve months.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In order to limit the administrative burden for exporters the competent authorities should be allowed to grant an exporter a global authorisation in respect of goods that are controlled to prevent the relevant goods from being used for torture or for other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.deleted
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Where controls on exports are applied, the provision of brokering services and the supply of technical assistance in relation to any of the listed goods should be prohibited, if the broker or supplier of technical assistance is aware that the relevant goods are or may be intended for capital punishment, when the controls are applied to prevent use for such punishment, or for torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, when the controls are intended to prevent such use. An economic operator shall have grounds for suspecting that the goods are or may be intended for such non- legitimate use, inter alia, if a competent authority has informed it that the goods are or may be intended for such non- legitimate use,
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) In order to give economic operators and enforcement authorities some time to make the changes to their operational procedures that are needed to comply with and enforce these prohibitions, a short transitional period of 6 months should be defined.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In order to adopt the provisions necessary for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amending Annexes I, II, III, IIIa, IIIb, IV and V to that Regulation. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 2 – point a
a) ‘torture’ means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from that person or from a third person information or a confession, punishing that person for an act that either that person or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing that person or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted either by or at the instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of, a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not, however, include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful penalties, but includes pain or suffering caused by the cumulative effects of deficiencies of the conditions of detention, such as cramped conditions of accommodation, lack of hygiene or of medical care and assistance, denial of contacts with the outside world, or an impoverished detention regime, irrespective of any specific or positive intention to inflict pain or suffering by those who are in charge of the prison or other place of detention, even if a natural person is deprived of his liberty in accordance with the law. Capital punishment is not deemed a lawful penalty under any circumstances;
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point m
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 2 – point m
m) ‘supplier of technical assistance or service’ means any natural or legal person or partnership resident or established in a Member State of the Union that supplies technical assistance or any service defined under point (f) from the Union into the territory of a third country;
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. For any export of goods listed in Annex III, an authorisation shall be required, irrespective of the origin of such goods. However, no authorisation shall be required for goods which only pass through the customs territory of the Union, namely those which are not assigned a customs approved treatment or use other than the external transit procedure under Article 91 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92, including storage of non-Union goods in a free zone of control type I or a free warehouse.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 7a – paragraph 1
1. A broker shall be prohibited from providing to any person, entity or body in a third country brokering services in relation to goods listed in Annex III, irrespective of the origin of such goods, if the broker knows or has grounds for suspectinghas clear indications that any part of a shipment of such goods is or may be intended to be used for torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in a country that does not belong to the customs territory of the Union.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 7b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. An authorisation shall be required for any export of goods listed in Annex IIIa, irrespective of the origin of such goods. However, no authorisation shall be required for goods which only pass through the customs territory of the Union, namely those which are not assigned a customs approved treatment or use other than the external transit procedure under Article 91 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92, including storage of non-Union goods in a free zone of control type I or a free warehouse.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 7c– paragraph 2
The competent authority shall not grant any authorisation when there are reasonable grounds for believingclear indications that the goods listed in Annex IIIa might be used for capital punishment in a third country.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 7c – paragraph 3.2
3.2. If an authorisation is requested for exporting goods listed in Annex IIIa to an end-user in a third country, the competent authority shall assess the risk of diversion taking into account the contractual arrangements that apply and the end-use statement signed by the end-user, if such a statement is provided. If no end-use statement is provided, it shall be up to the exporter to demonstrate who will be the end-user and what use will be made of the goods. If the exporter fails to provide sufficient information to assess the risk of diversion, the competent authority shall be deemed to have reasonable grounds for believing that the goods might be used for capital punishment.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 7d – paragraph 1
1. A broker shall be prohibited from providing to any person, entity or body in a third country brokering services in relation to goods listed in Annex IIIa, irrespective of the origin of such goods, if the broker knows or has grounds for suspectinghas clear indications that any part of a shipment of such goods is or may be intended to be used for capital punishment in a country that does not belong to the customs territory of the Union.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 7d – paragraph 2
2. A supplier of technical assistance shall be prohibited from supplying to any person, entity or body in a third country technical assistance in relation to goods listed in Annex IIIa, irrespective of the origin of such goods, if the supplier of technical assistance knows or has grounds for suspectinghas clear indications that some or all of the relevant goods are or may be intended to be used for capital punishment in a country that does not belong to the customs territory of the Union.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The competent authorities of the Member States shall exchange information on all exporters deprived of the right to use the Union General Export Authorisation, unless they determine that a specific exporter will not attempt to export goods listed in Annex IIIa through another Member State. A secure and encrypted system for exchange of information shall be used for this purpose.
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 12
Article 12 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 12 Amendment of Annexes The Commission shall be empowered, in accordance with Article 15a, to adopt delegated acts to amend Annexes I, II, III, IIIa, IIIb, IV and V. The data in Annex I regarding competent authorities of the Member States shall be amended on the basis of information supplied by the Member States. Where, in the case of amendment of Annex II, III or IIIa, imperative grounds of urgency so require, the procedure provided for in Article 15b shall apply to delegated acts adopted pursuant to this Article.’deleted
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 15a
(15) After Article 15, the following Articles are inserted: ‘Article 15a Exercise of delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The delegation of power referred to in Article 12 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from …. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 12 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect on the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 12 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months from the notification of that act to the European Parliament and to the Council or if, before expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.deleted
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 15b
Article 15bdeleted
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 15b – title
‘Article 16b Urgency procedure 1. Ddelegated acts adopted under this Article shall enter into force without delay and shall apply as long as no objection is expressed in accordance with paragraph 2. The notification of a delegated act to the European Parliament and to the Council shall state the reasons for the use of the urgency procedure. 2. Either the European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15a(5). In such a case, the Commission shall repeal the act without delay following the notification of the decision to object by the European Parliament or the Council.’
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Annexes
(15) The Annexes are amended as follows: α) In Annex III, section 4 is deleted b) A new Annex IIIa, the text of which is set out in Annex I to this Regulation, is added. c) A new Annex IIIb, the text of which is set out in Annex II to this Regulation, is added.deleted
2015/06/15
Committee: AFET