BETA

Activities of Georgios EPITIDEIOS related to 2017/0125(COD)

Plenary speeches (1)

European Defence Industrial Development Programme (debate) EL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0125(COD)

Amendments (10)

Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) In order to contribute to the enhancement of the competitiveness and innovation capacity of the Union's defence industry, a European Defence Industrial Development Programme (hereinafter referred to as the Programme) should be established. The Programme should aim at enhancing the competitiveness of the Union's defence industry inter alia cyber defence by supporting the cooperation between undertakings in the development phase of defence products and technologies. The development phase, which follows the research and technology phase, entails significant risks and costs that hamper the further exploitation of the results of research and adversely impact the competitiveness of the Union's defence industry. Particularly at this stage when State economies are under heavy pressure, the citizens of the Member States are questioning the expediency and scope of this initiative. By supporting the development phase, the Programme would contribute to a better exploitation of the results of defence research and it would help to cover the gap between research and production as well as to promote all forms of innovation. The Programme should complement activities carried out in accordance with Article 182 TFEU and it does not cover the production of defence products and technologies.
2017/11/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) To better exploit economies of scale in the defence industry, the Programme should support the cooperation between undertakings in the development of defence products and technologies. At the same time, an agreement in principle should also be sought for the allocation of the means for industrial production.
2017/11/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In view of the specificities of the sector, in practice no collaborative project between undertakings will be launched if the Member States have not first agreed to support such projects, taking into account their needs, the scope thereof and their ability to participate in them. After having defined common defence capability priorities at Union-level and also taking into account where appropriate collaborative initiatives on a regional basis, Member States identify and consolidate military requirements and define the technical specifications of the project. They may also appoint a project manager in charge of leading the work related to the development of a collaborative project.
2017/11/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) As the objective of the Programme is to support the competitiveness of the Union defence industry by de-risking the development phase of cooperative projects, actions related to the development of a defence product or technology, namely definition of common technical specifications, design, prototyping, testing, qualification, certification as well feasibility studies and other supporting measures, should be eligible to benefit from it. This will also apply to the upgrade of existing defence products and technologies. An important factor is also the definition of the criteria for selecting the countries to which the defence products will be made available. Countries in which democratic rights and human rights are being violated will be ruled out.
2017/11/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) As the Programme aims at enhancing the competitiveness of the Union's defence industry, only entities established in the Union and effectively controlled by Member States or their nationals should be eligible for support. Additionally, in order to ensure the protection of essential security interests of the Union and its Member States, the infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources used by the beneficiaries and subcontractors in actions funded under the Programme, shall not be located on the territory of non-Member States. It is also important to decide on how to promote the products in third countries. Namely, whether this is to be done through transnational co-operation or also through private intermediaries.
2017/11/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The promotion of innovation and technological development in the Union defence industry should take place in a manner coherent with the security interests of the Union. Accordingly, the action's contribution to those interests and to the defence capability priorities commonly agreed by Member States should serve as an award criterion. These should be free of political considerations and extend as far as possible without exceeding customers' real requirements in order to reduce the production costs of the products in order to make them competitive.Within the Union, common defence capability priorities are identified notably through the Capability Development Plan. Other Union processes such as the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD) and the Permanent Structured Cooperation will support the implementation of relevant priorities through enhanced cooperation. Where appropriate regional or international cooperative initiatives, such as in the NATO context, and serving the Union security and defence interest, may also be taken into account.
2017/11/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The financial assistance of the Union under the Programme should not exceed 20% of the total eligible cost of the action when it relates to prototyping which is often the most costly action in the development phase. The totality of the eligible costs should however be covered for other actions in the development phase. A criterion for determining the contribution of each Member State will be its financial capacity. It is not appropriate that the cost of participation should be cut at the expense of social spending.
2017/11/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. When it relates to actions defined under point (b) to (f) of the first paragraph, the action must be based on common technical specifications. The above actions shall be carried out in a fully transparent manner.
2017/11/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point γ
(c) contribution to the economic interests and the security and defence interests of the Union by enhancing defence technologies which contribute to implement defence capability priorities commonly agreed by Member States within the Union; and,
2017/11/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall take appropriate measures to ensure that, when actions financed under this Regulation are implemented, the financial interests of the Union are protected by the application of preventive measures against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, by effective checks and, if irregularities are detected, by the recovery or, where appropriate, the restitution of the amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative and financial penalties. and provision shall be made to eliminate unfair competition between Member States.
2017/11/24
Committee: AFET