4 Amendments of Patricija ŠULIN related to 2016/2163(DEC)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the very low level of cancelled carry-overs (less than 2 %) and the very high level of consumption of its Union subsidies (99 %); agrees that this is an indicator of good planning and management if the consumption includes beneficial and necessary activities; notes, however, that the level of carry-overs of committed appropriations was high (70 %) for expenditures but acknowledges that this is as a result of the nature of activities of the Agency that involve procuringwas high; a multi-annual funding planning would cover the activities and studies that span over many more years; calls on ths, often beyond year-ende Agency to eliminate any ineffective budget planning;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the solid output of the Agency; notes that it organised 60 events bringing together its key partners and stakeholders to discuss fundamental rights issues in various thematic areas; acknowledges that the Agency offered its expertise at 240 presentations and hearings and that it published its research in 32 reports and papers; recalls that the Agency formulated 122 opinions in response to requests from Member States, Union institutions and other international organisations; further welcomes its pro- active approach towards the European Parliament;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – point a (new)
Paragraph 5 – point a (new)
(a) Calls on the Agency to adopt internal binding rules for the protection of whistle-blowers according to Article 22c of the EU Staff Regulations which came into force on 1 January 2014.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – point b (new)
Paragraph 5 – point b (new)
(b) Welcomes the publication of declaration of interests and CVs of its Management Board members and deplores that the CVs of the alternate members of the Management Board from Bulgaria, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Netherlands, Poland, Council of Europe, UK and the European Commission are not publicly available; recalls that the transparency is a key element for upholding the trust of the Union citizens in Union institutions; calls on the Agency to draft and submit to the discharge authority a track record of cases of conflict of interest identified;