BETA

17 Amendments of Helga STEVENS related to 2016/0151(COD)

Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
(26) There are new challenges, in particular in connection with video-sharing platforms, on which users - particularly minors - increasingly consume audiovisual content. In this context, harmful content and hate addition, the decision to remove such content, should respeech stored on video-sharing platforms have inct the principle of freedom of expreassingly given rise to concern. Ion. In this context, it is necessary, in order to protect minors from harmful content and all citizens from content containing incitement to violence or hatred hosted on video- sharing platforms, but also to protect and guarantee the fundamental rights of users, to set out proportionate rules on those matters.
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) An important share of the content hostored on video-sharing platforms is not under the editorial responsibility of the video-sharing platform provider. However, those providers typically determine the organisation of the content, namely programmes or user-generated videos, including by automatic means or algorithms. Therefore, those providers should be required to take appropriate measures to protect minors from content that may impair their physical, or mental or moral development and protect all citizenusers from incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to sex, race, colour, religion, disability, descent or national or ethnic origin.
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) In light of the nature of the providers' involvement with the content hostored on video-sharing platforms, those appropriate measures should relate to the organisation of the content and not to the content as such. The requirements in this regard as set out in this Directive should therefore apply without prejudice to Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34, which provides for an exemption from liability for illegal information stored by certain providers of information society services. When providing services covered by Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC, those requirements should also apply without prejudice to Article 15 of that Directive, which precludes general obligations to monitor such information and to actively seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity from being imposed on those providers, without however concerning monitoring obligations in specific cases and, in particular, without affecting judicial orders by national authorities in accordance with national legislation. _________________ 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (OJ L 178, 17.07.2000, p. 1).
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
(31) When taking the appropriate measures to protect minors from harmful content and to protect all citizens from content containing incitement to violence or hatred in accordance with this Directive, the applicable fundamental rights, as laid down in the Charter on Fundamental Rights of the European Union, should be carefully balanced. That concerns in particular, as the case may be, the right to respect for private and family life and the protection of personal data, the freedom of expression and information, the freedom to conduct a business, the prohibition of discrimination and the right of the child. Member States have an obligation to ensure that the balance of incentives for media service providers and video-sharing platform providers covered by this Directive is such that legal content, including content which can offend, shock or disturb, can be communicated. Similarly, age verification should only be proportionate and should be implemented in a way which offers the maximum protection of privacy.
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
(36) ERGA has made a positive contribution towards consistent regulatory practice and has provided high level and independent advice to the Commission on implementation matters. This calls for the formal recognition and reinforcement of its role in this Directive. The group should therefore be re-established by virtue of this Directive.
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 6 a – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that audiovisual media service providers provide sufficient information to viewers about content which may impair the physical, or mental or moral development of minors. For this purpose, Member States may use a system of descriptors indicating the nature of the content of an audiovisual media service.
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 28 a – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) protect minors from content which may impair their physical, or mental or moral development;
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 28 a – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) protect all citizens from content containing incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to sex, race, colour, religion, disability, descent or national or ethnic origin.
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 28 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) defining and applying in the terms and conditions of the video-sharing platform providers the concepts of incitement to violence or hatred as referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 and of content which may impair the physical, or mental or moral development of minors, in accordance with Articles 6 and 12 respectively;
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Directive 201/13/EU
Article 28 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) establishing and operating age verification systems for users of video- sharing platforms with respect to content which may impair the physical, or mental or moral development of minors;
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Directive 201/13/EU
Article 28 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point e
(e) providing for parental control systems with respect to content which may impair the physical, or mental or moral development of minors;
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Directive 201/13/EU
Article 33 – paragraph 2
By [date – no later than four years after adoption] at the latest, and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the application of this Directive, including pertaining to the implementation of freedom of expression as regards Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
2016/12/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 a (new)
(38a) The rights of persons with disabilities and of the elderly to participate in and be integrated into the social and cultural life of the Union is inextricably linked to the provision of accessible audiovisual media services. It is therefore important to ensure that accessibility is properly addressed in Directive 2010/13/EU, in line with the general principles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The horizontal Commission proposal for a European Accessibility Act36a aims to enshrine these principles in Union law by removing barriers to access created by divergent legislation. While this is a welcome development and is considered appropriate in respect of the consumer equipment necessary to access audiovisual media content, the unique nature and cultural specificity of audiovisual media content itself is such that the regulation of existing and future access services that enable access to such content should remain in Directive 2010/13/EU, which is sector-specific. __________________ 36a COM(2015)615 final.
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38 b (new)
(38b) The means to achieve accessibility should include, but not be limited to, access services such as sign language interpretation, subtitling for the deaf and hard of hearing, spoken subtitles, audio- description, and easily understandable menu navigation. Audiovisual media service providers should be transparent and proactive in improving such access services for persons with disabilities and for the elderly.
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point e a (new)
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ea) The following point is inserted: (ga) 'access service' means, but is not limited to, an add-on feature of an audiovisual media service that improves the accessibility of a programme for people with functional limitations, including persons with disabilities. Access services include, but are not limited to: (i) subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing: synchronized visual text alternative for both speech and non- speech audio information needed to understand the media content; (ii) audio description: additional audible narrative, interleaved with the dialogue, which describes the significant aspects of the visual content of the programme that cannot be understood from the main soundtrack alone; (iii) spoken subtitles or audio subtitles: read aloud of subtitles in the national language when the audio speech is in a different language; (iv) sign language interpretation: simultaneous translation of both speech and non-speech audio information needed to understand the programme, provided in the national sign language.´
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 600 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 7
(10) Article 7 is deleted;
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 7 a (new)
(10a) The following article is inserted: 'Article 7a 1. Member States shall take steps to develop codes of conduct applicable to media service providers under their jurisdiction intended to ensure that their services are made progressively more accessible to persons with visual and/or hearing disabilities. 2. Such codes of conduct may be a self- or co-regulatory measure. The Commission and ERGA shall facilitate the exchange of best practice between audiovisual media service providers. 3. Such codes of conduct shall include a requirement that media service providers report on an annual basis to Member States about the steps taken and progress made in respect of progressively making their services more accessible to persons with visual and/or hearing disabilities. Member States shall ensure that this information is made publically available. 4. Such codes of conduct shall encourage audiovisual media service providers to develop, and make publicly available, accessibility action plans made in respect of progressively making their services more accessible to persons with visual and/or hearing disabilities. Such action plans shall be communicated to national regulatory authorities.';
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT