8 Amendments of Eva KAILI related to 2016/0280(COD)
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28 a (new)
Recital 28 a (new)
(28 a) Considering the technological developments in the field of distributed ledger technology, it is important to recognise the opportunity for the introduction of public decentralized ledgers, such as blockchain, to register, catalogue and protect against copyright infrigement. Such an application could serve as a registry of ownership, facilitating traceability, and monitoring the use of copyrighted material, creating the conditions to enable the "by default" protection of creators and rightholders.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28 b (new)
Recital 28 b (new)
(28 b) Building on the use of distributed ledger technologies, other than traceability and protection against copyright infringement, the issue of renumeration could be adresssed. The use of smart contracts could revolutionize royalties allocationn making it more transparent, effective and less costly. The parties involved connected by a ntework of a distributed ledger, such as blockchain, could set the contract terms and create automatic procedures that would deliver the royalties, upon usage of the copyrighted material resulting in the fair renumeration of the creators and rightholders.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36 a (new)
Recital 36 a (new)
(36 a) With regards to the issue of dissemination of fake news, it is important stress out the limited liability safe harbours for intermediaries in the protection of an open internet ecosystem. However, the involved parties need to create the digital tools to balance byist approaches and dissemination of false information. Most notably, when false information is spread online in high concentration, in particular geographical areas, resulting in influencing parts of the population, the user(s) should also be provided with related to the false information, articles, that showcase the other points of view, on his online interface of use.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 46
Recital 46
(46) Any processing of personal data under this Directive should respect fundamental rights, including the right to respect for private and family life and the right to protection of personal data under Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and must be in compliance with Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council35 and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council36 . In the future, the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation, including the "right to be forgotten" should be respected. _________________ 35 Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31– 50). This Directive is repealed with effect from 25 May 2018 and shall be replaced by Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88). 36 Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37–47), called, as amended by Directives 2006/24/EC and 2009/136/EC, the “e- Privacy Directive”.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 46 a (new)
Recital 46 a (new)
(46 a) It is important to stress out the importance of anonymity, when handling personal data for commercial purposes. Additionally, the "by default" not sharing option with regards to personal data while using online platform interfaces should be promoted.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place effective mechanisms, including for complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices for the implementation of , such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologimeasures, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notes the importance of innovative solutions based on distributed ledger technologies, such as the use of smart contracts that could facilitate agreements and transactions between parties making them more transparent, effective and less costly.