7 Amendments of Miltiadis KYRKOS related to 2018/0138(COD)
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) Given that too often Member States’ national infrastructure plans are decided without reference to the TEN-T objectives, and therefore without taking into account the deadlines to be met as set out in the Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, good coordination between the national and the Union level of planning and compliance with the deadlines set out in this regulation should be taken into account when projects are evaluated in terms of the project selection maturity criteria, established by the Connecting Europe Facility.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) “comprehensive decision” means the decision or set of decisions taken by a Member Statethe competent authorityies orf authorities Member State not including courts or tribunals that determines whether or not a project promoter is to be granted authorisation to build the transport infrastructure needed to complete a project without prejudice to any decision taken in the context of an administrative appeal procedure;
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. To ensure efficient administrative procedures related to projects of common interest, project promoters and all authorities concerned shall ensure that the most rapid treatment legally possible is given to these projects, including as regards the evaluation of the project selection maturity criteria and the resources allocated.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. In order to meet the time limits set out in Article 6 and reduce the administrative burden related to the completion of projects of common interest, all the administrative procedures resulting from the applicable law, both national and of the Unionincluding the relevant environmental assessments, both at national and Union level, shall be integrated and result in only one comprehensive decision.
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. IWithout prejudice to the deadlines set out in Article 6 of this regulation, in the case of projects of common interest for which the obligation to carry out assessments of the effects on the environment arises simultaneously from Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and other Union law, Member States shall ensure that joint procedures within the meaning of Article 2(3) of Directive 2011/92/EU are provided for.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The comprehensive decision issued by the single competent authority shall be the sole legally binding decision resulting from the statutory permit granting procedure. Without prejudice to the deadlines set out in Article 6 of this regulation, where other authorities are concerned by the project, they may give their opinion as input to the procedure, in accordance with national legislation. This opinion shall be taken into account by the single competent authority.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b – point i
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b – point i
(i) the decisions, assessments and opinions to be obtained;