BETA

4 Amendments of Philippe LOISEAU related to 2016/2148(INI)

Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. WelcomNotes the higher allocation by the Member States of funds for environmental measures and for physical investments aimed at boosting competitiveness; expects that those measures will have a long- lasting impact and high economic leverage;
2016/09/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Commission and the Member States to avoid gold-plating or adding unnecessary guidelines and procedures which could interfere with efficient implementation of the EAFRD; asks the Commission to continue the simplification of the CAP and, where feasible and necessary, to adapt the basic legislation to this effect; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that sufficient resources are dedicated to successful fulfilment of remaining ex-ante conditionalities;
2016/09/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that the Directorate- General for Agriculture and Rural Development has the necessary technical knowledge and overview of rural and agricultural issues and is therefore the natural manager of the RDPs, and urges the Commission to ensure that staffing levels are in place to ensure proper implementation and auditing of the CAP;deleted
2016/09/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Takes the view that where rural and agricultural issues are concerned, it is for the State to coordinate the implementation and harmonisation of RDPs; takes the view that the EAFRD, under the programming period for 2014- 2020, is bypassing the role of the State in this case by making the Commission responsible for allocating RDPs and the regions responsible for managing them; deplores the fact that the national level is increasingly being left out although it is vital in order to ensure overall cohesion of this policy;
2016/09/06
Committee: AGRI