BETA

Activities of Jiří POSPÍŠIL related to 2017/0035(COD)

Reports (1)

REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers
2020/10/12
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2017/0035(COD)
Documents: PDF(361 KB) DOC(164 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Jiří POSPÍŠIL', 'mepid': None}]

Amendments (3)

Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a
"3a. Where no opinion is delivered in the "3a. Where no opinion is delivered in the appeal committee, the Commission may appeal committee, the Commission may refer the matter to the Council for an refer the matter to the Council for an opinion indicating its views and opinion on the wider implications of the orientation on the wider implications of absence of opinion, including the the absence of opinion, including the institutional, legal, economic, political and institutional, legal, political and international implications. The international implications. The Commission shall take account of the Commission shall take account of any position expressed by the Council within 3 position expressed by the Council within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadline in the referral."; shorter deadline in the referral.";
2020/03/04
Committee: JURI
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a
"3a. Where no opinion is delivered in the "3a. Where no opinion is delivered in the appeal committee, the Commission may appeal committee, the Commission may refer the matter to the Council for an refer the matter to the Council for an opinion indicating its views and opinion on the wider context of the orientation on the wider implications of absence of opinion, including the the absence of opinion, including the institutional, legal, economic, political and institutional, legal, political and international implications. The international implications. The Commission shall take account of any Commission shall take account of any position expressed by the Council within 3 position expressed by the Council within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadline in the referral.";
2020/03/04
Committee: JURI
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 11
exceeds the implementing powers provided for in(3a) Article 11 is replaced by the following: Article 11 “Article 11 Right of scrutiny for the European Right of scrutiny for the European Parliament and the Council Parliament and the Council Where a basic act is adopted under the Where a basic act is adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure, either the ordinary legislative procedure, either the European Parliament or the Council may at European Parliament or the Council may at any time indicate to the Commission that, any time indicate to the Commission that, in its view, a draft implementing act in its view, a draft implementing act exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic act, or is in conflict with the objectives of the basic act. In such a case, the Commission shall review the draft implementing act, taking account of the positions expressed, and shall inform the European Parliament and the Council whether it intends to maintain, amend or withdraw the draft implementing act.
2020/03/04
Committee: JURI