10 Amendments of Jiří POSPÍŠIL related to 2017/2278(INI)
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to finalise swiftly the Guidance on Public Procurement of Innovation and the Guidperspective on socially responsibleility in public procurement, in order to facilitate the implementation of the respective legal provisions in the Member States;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission to better organise the guides and other tools developed to help Member States with the implementation of the public procurement framework, in a more user-friendly way so that offers a good overview to practitionersthey are clear to everyone who deals with them in practice, while also paying attention to the languages available;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that the current Union legislation, more than ever, allows for public procurement to be used as a strategic instrument to promote EU policy goals, and encourages the Member States to get the most that they can out of it;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to use public procurement strategically in order to promote a sustainable, circular and socially responsible economy, as well as innovation, SME growth and competition; underlines that this requires Member States to signal such policies at the highest level and support, to this end, procurers and practitioners in the public administration;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the example of adopting National Public Procurement Strategies and encourages more Member States to follow this example as a means of modernising and streamlining their public procurement systems;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. While aAcknowledginges that in some cases the low price reflects innovative solutions and efficient management, is concerned about the excessivbut is nonetheless convinced that the use of the lowest price as an decisive award criterion in a number of Member States and therefore callsshould always be duly justified; calls, in this regard, on the Commission and the Member States to analyse the reason behind this situationcarry out an analysis of this issue;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that it is important for contracting authorities to consider the full life-cycle of products, including their impact on the environment, in their purchasing decisions, and calls on the Commission to assist in the development of methodologies to implement the concept of ‘life-cycle costing’;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that innovative, socio- economic and environmental considerations are legitimate award criteria in public procurement, but that contracting authorities can also pursue green, innovative or social goals through well-thought-out specifications and by allowing variant offers;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Member States to support SMEs’ participation in tenders, for example by mandatory division intoadvertising them in smaller lots;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the Commission to analyse in particular the impediments to cross- border public procurement resulting from language and administrative barriers, and to propose solutions;