BETA

11 Amendments of Jiří POSPÍŠIL related to 2021/0394(COD)

Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall apply to: (a) electronic communication between competent authorities in the context of the legal acts listed in Annex I and Annex II; (b) electronic communication between natural or legal persons and competent authorities, and electronic payment of fees in cross-border civil and commercial matters, in the context of the legal acts listed in Annex I; and (c) videoconferencing in proceedings falling under the scope of the legal acts listed in Annex I and Annex II or in other civil and commercial matters, where one of the parties is present in another Member State.deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Written cCommunication between competent authorities in cases falling under the scope of the legal acts listed in Annex I and Annex II, including the exchange of forms established by these acts, shall be carried out through a secure and reliable decentralised IT system.
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The European electronic access point shall refer to the European e-justice Portal as regards the information for natural and legal persons on their right to legal assistance and shall allow natural and legal persons to file claims, launch requests, send and receive procedurally relevant information and communicate with the competent authorities.The European electronic access point shall be accessible from the European e-justice Portal which is available in all EU official languages and contains all necessary forms.
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Competent authorities shall accept electronic communication under Article 5(1), transmitted through the European electronic access point or national IT portals, where available.
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – title
Hearing through videoconferencing or other distance communication technology in civil and commercial matters when one of the parties is present in another Member States
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Without prejudice to specific provisions regulating the use of videoconferencing or other distance communication technology in proceedings under the legal acts listed in Annex I, and upon request of a party to proceedings falling under the scope of these legal acts or in other civil and commercial matters where one of the parties is present in another Member State, or upon request of their legal or authorised representative, competent authorities shall allow their participation to a hearing by videoconferencing or other distance communication technology, provided that:
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. A request for conducting an oral hearing through videoconferencing or other distance communication technology may be refused by the competent authority where the particular circumstances of the case are not compatible with the use of such technology.deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Competent authorities may on their own motion allow the participation of parties to hearings by videoconference, provided that all parties to the proceedings are given the possibility to submit an opinion on the use of videoconferencing or other distance communication technology.deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Subject to this Regulation, tThe procedure for requesting and conducting a videoconference shall be regulated by the national law of the Member State conducting videoconferencethe hearing.
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the suspect, accused or convicted persons expressed consent on the use of videoconferencing or other distance communication technology. Before expressing consent on the use of videoconferencing or other distance communication technology the suspect or the accused person shall have the possibility to seek the advice of a lawyer in accordance with Directive 2013/48/EU.deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. A suspect, an accused and the convicted person shall have the right to an effective legal remedy under national law in the event of a breach of this Article.deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE