4 Amendments of Jordi CAÑAS related to 2020/2014(INL)
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the vulnerability to cybersecurity threats, software updates, limited predictability and self-learning operations of AI may hamper compensations for claims in cases where this seems justified;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to evaluate whether and to what extent the burden of proof should be reversed in order to empower harmed consumers while preventing abuse and providing legal clarity for businesses, as well as to ensure fairness and to mitigate the informational asymmetries impairing the situation of injured parties;
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses that the Commission should consider tailored liability rules in sectors where significant risks are likely to arise, which may potentially undermine fundamental rights and result in high costs in both human and social terms, such as where AI applications are deployed for educational purposes;
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the Commission to study the suitability of compulsory liability insurance for AI applications, which could provide protection to third parties exposed to an increased risk of harm and better access to compensation for victims; notes, however, that insurance offers for certain risks might be difficult to calculate due to missing experience in the particular case of AI; considers therefore that any legal provisions in this regard should be introduced with careful analysis and be balanced enough not to impede the deployment of AI technology in the Single Market and to effectively foster innovation.