Activities of Domènec RUIZ DEVESA related to 2019/2207(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
European Arrest Warrant and surrender procedures between Member States (debate)
Amendments (5)
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that the FDEAW should be put in action in coordination with the establishment of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights will contributeing to reinforcinge mutual trust between Member States;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that further horizontal measures need to be adopted in order to deep the principle of sincere cooperation (art. 4.3. TEU) and to increase mutual confidence in national criminal justice systems, thereby leading to more efficient judicial cooperation; emphasizes that national judicial authorities should apply the principle of double-incrimination without judging the substance of the accusation;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the FDEAW should be fully brought under the Lisbon Treaty as a new legislative instrument; is convinced that this would provide substantial benefits in terms of democratic legitimacy, legal certainty and transparency, enhance coherence with other criminal law instruments, and allow for clarification of ‘judicial authority’ as an autonomous concept of EU law; supports including crimes against the constitutional integrity of the EU Member States in the FDEAW list;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. PBelieves that further horizontal measures need to be adopted to enhance the principle of sincere cooperation (art. 4.3 TEU) and to increase mutual trust in national criminal justice systems, thereby leading to more efficient judicial cooperation; points out that a double criminality check limits mutual recognition and, according to the CJEU, must be interpreted restrictively; notes that mutual recognition should ideally work automatically27 without judging the substantial grounds of the accusation; _________________ 27See, for example, the Commission communication of 26 July 2000 on the Mutual Recognition of Final Decisions in Criminal Matters (COM(2000)0495).
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Reiterates the importance of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, in the form of an interinstitutional agreement consisting of an annual independent and evidence-based review to assess the compliance of all EU Member States with Article 2 TEU, plus country-specific recommendations; notes the establishment of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights as a key tool contributing to strengthen mutual trust between Member States in the context of the application of the FDEAW;