6 Amendments of Domènec RUIZ DEVESA related to 2020/2136(INI)
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 – introductory part
Paragraph 11 – introductory part
11. Considers that Article 50 of the TEU strikes a good balance between ensuring a withdrawal process and safeguarding the flexibility necessary for adaptation to the specific circumstances; believes, however, that, in the framework of a possible future reform of the Treaty, the opportunity of remedying some of the loopholes identifiedto further clarify some provisions in Article 50 of the TEU could be assessed, with particular regard to the following:
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 – indent 2
Paragraph 11 – indent 2
- a possible legal basis and strict conditions for transitional arrangements,
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 – indent 3
Paragraph 11 – indent 3
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Believes, furthermore, that the withdrawal provisions of the Treaty should, as much as possible, ensure legal certainty for the EU citizens affected by the withdrawal, setting out minimum standards for the protection of their rightand an effective enforcement system for the protection of their rights without the prejudice of also include the creation of follow-up mechanisms and information campaigns;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Emphasises that the role of political oversight of the European Parliament is indispensable in a parliamentary democratic system; insists, in this regard, that no procedural constraints or political objectives should override or limit in time or scope the parliamentary scrutiny phase as regardsthe parliamentary powers regarding the scrutiny phase should be properly guaranteed as regards the conclusion of any international agreements, and in particular, those concluded in the context of a withdrawal from the European Union;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Believes that both the Brexit Steering Group as well as the UK Coordination Group structures created by the European Parliament in the context of the negotiations with the UK were of the outmost importance to guarantee the follow-up and the involvement of the Parliament in the negotiations; Further believes that this experience provided a good example of collective coordination between institutions;