7 Amendments of Markus BUCHHEIT related to 2020/2016(INI)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the functioning of the digital single market should be improved by reinforcing legal certainty for providers of artificial intelligence (AI), and reinforcing users’ trust by strengthening safeguards to ensure the rule of law and fundamental rights, while stressing that criminal law legislation falls within the competence of each Member State;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that AI used by police and judicial authorities has to be categorised as high-risk, given that the role of these authorities is to defend the public interest; considers that the EU should take the lead in laying down basic rules on the development and use of AI to ensure the same high level of consumer protection across the EU;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that AI should help to ease the administrative burden on public authorities, without ever replacing human decisions, and that AI systems shouldmust rely on human oversight; emphasizes the importance of avoiding the use of algorithms with judicial functions, predictive assessments on the dangerousness of subjects and predictive policing practices.
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that data collection and the monitoring of individuals should be limited to criminal suspects; stresses that data which are no longer relevant to the proceedings must be deleted;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls the high risk of abuse of certain types of AI, including facial recognition technologies in public spaces, automated behaviour detection and profiling to divide people into risk categories at borders, and calls on the CommissionMember States to ban them;