BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

5 Amendments of Sander LOONES related to 2016/0360A(COD)

Amendment 220 #
Tom VANDENKENDELAERE, Lieve WIERINCK, Sander LOONES, Hugues BAYET, Lívia JÁRÓKA, Dariusz ROSATI
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
(56) In light of the strengthened group supervision resulting from the reinforcement of the prudential regulatory framework and the establishment of the Banking Union, it is desirable that institutions take ever more advantage of the benefits of the single market, including for ensuring an efficient management of capital and liquidity resources throughout the group. Therefore the possibility to waive the application of requirements on an individual level for subsidiaries or parents should be available to cross-border groups, provided there are adequate safeguards to ensure that sufficient capital and liquidity will be at the disposal of entities subject to the waiver. Where all the safeguards are met, it will be for the competent authority to decide whether to grant such waivers. Competent authorities' decisions should be duly justified.deleted
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 261 #
Tom VANDENKENDELAERE, Lívia JÁRÓKA, Sander LOONES, Hugues BAYET, Dariusz ROSATI, Lieve WIERINCK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 7 – paragraphs 1 and 2
(5) In Article 7, paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following: [...]deleted
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 275 #
Tom VANDENKENDELAERE, Lieve WIERINCK, Sander LOONES, Hugues BAYET, Lívia JÁRÓKA, Dariusz ROSATI
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(b) the parent institution on a consolidated basis or the subsidiary institution on a sub-consolidated basis monitors and has oversight at all times over the liquidity positions, and the funding positions where the NSFR set out in Title IV of Part Six is waived, of all institutions within the liquiditygroup or sub- group, that are subject to the waiver in accordance with this paragraph and ensures a sufficient level of liquidity, and of stable funding where the NSFR set out in Title IV of Part Six is waived, for all of those institutions;
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 286 #
Tom VANDENKENDELAERE, Lieve WIERINCK, Hugues BAYET, Lívia JÁRÓKA, Dariusz ROSATI, Sander LOONES
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the distribution of amounts, location and ownership of the required liquid assets to be held within the single liquidity sub-group where the LCR as defined in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 is waived and the distribution of amounts and location of available stable funding within the single liquidity sub- group where the NSFR set out in Title IV of Part Six of this Regulation is waived;
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 287 #
Tom VANDENKENDELAERE, Lieve WIERINCK, Sander LOONES, Hugues BAYET, Lívia JÁRÓKA, Dariusz ROSATI
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the determination of minimum amounts of liquid assets to be held by institutions for which the application of Part Six will bethe LCR as defined in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 is waived and the determination of minimum amounts of available stable funding to be held by institutions for which the application of the NSFR set out in Title IV of Part Six of this Regulation is waived;
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation