BETA

19 Amendments of Urmas PAET related to 2018/2099(INI)

Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the rules-based world order is being increasingly challenged both at the political-military level and, more recently, at the commercial-economic one, and that the societal, ecological, economic, technological and geopolitical trends point to the growing vulnerability of the world's population to shocks and stresses; notes that these systemic challenges are being accompanied by the continuous deterioration of the international environment confronted with interstate conflicts, natural disasters, extreme weather events, water crises, terrorism, state failure and cyber and hybrid attacks on the foundational pillars of our societies; acknowledges that the defence of the rules-based international order and the values defended by liberal democracies should be of the outmost priority and should be approached without compromise;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the rules-based world order is being increasingly challenged both at the political-military level and, more recently, at the commercial-economic one; notes that these systemic challenges are being accompanied by the continuous deterioration of the international environment confronted with violence, interstate conflicts, natural disasters, terrorism, state failure and cyber and hybrid attacks on the foundational pillars of our societies;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that these challenges are too vast to be successfully met by any single country; emphasises that it is vital for the EU to respond to these challenges, consistently, effectively and with one voice; notes that the CSDP is a useful tool for addressing many of these challeng and to do so in concert with our allies and partners; stresses that strong cooperation is needed in the context of CSDP as well as focusing of resources on strategic priorities;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that this need for cooperation has been increasingly recognised in recent years and welcomes the advances that have been made in this direction, like establishing permanent structured cooperation (PESCO);
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises, however, that to this date cooperation is still in a developing stage and much more needs to be done to ensure that the EU and Member States reap the rewards of deep, and sustained, long-term cooperation on defence that will lead to common EU defence;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Emphasises practical and financial benefits of further integrations of European defence capabilities; underlines that through comprehensive and trustworthy work of all stakeholders, it is possible to increase the scope and efficiency of defence spending without the increase of defence spending itself;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls on the Member States to aim for the target of 2% of GDP for defence spending, and to spend 20% of their defence budgets on equipment identified as necessary through the EDA, including related research and development;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the creation of a dedicated title for defence in the Commission’s MFF proposal, and in particular the establishment of a budget line from which the European Defence Fund and Military Mobility projects will be funded; is of the opinion that these decisions will, most probably, call for a centralized management on defence at Commission level; underlines that funding from that budget line should be exclusively spent for defence purposes without politicization as security is indivisible and should be coherent with the capability and infrastructure needs of Member States and in line with the EU’s aspirations for strategic defence autonomy;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. CUrges the establishment of precise and binding guidelines to provide a well- defined framework for future activation and implementation of Article 42(7) TEU; calls, therefore, for the conceptualization and adoption of a EU Security and Defence White Book that will guarantee that future capability building processes will be based on EU´s strategic security interests in accordance with military and industrial necessities;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. RUnderlines that the EU needs to apply the entire toolbox of available policy instruments - from soft to hard power and from short-term measures to long-term policies, reaffirms the importance of developing the necessary military capabilities to deal with the comprehensive security challenges in and around Europe outlined by the EU Global Strategy; recalls that European Union´s Global Strategy encourages the realization of deep defence cooperation;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Reaffirms the importance of developing the necessary military capabilities to deal with the comprehensive security challenges in and around Europe outlined by the EU Global Strategy as the facilitation of the EU security is firstly and chiefly EU obligation; recalls that European Union´s Global Strategy encourages the realization of deep defence cooperation that would lead, as stipulated in the Lisbon Treaty, to a common EU defence;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Strongly believes that the EU’s long-standing and largest CSDP mission, EUFOR BiH / Operation Althea, still plays an important role of deterrence as a visible sign of EU commitment to the country; considers it therefore essential to continue its executive mandate and sustain its current force strength (600 staff) as the safe and secure environment has still the potential to deteriorate with increased tensions and current ethno-nationalist centred politics;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29 a. Stresses the need to ease the administrative procedures for the cross- border movement of rapid response forces inside the EU;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 b (new)
29 b. Urges the EEAS and the Council to step up their ongoing efforts to improve cyber security, in particular for CSDP missions, inter alia by taking measures at EU and Member State levels to mitigate threats to the CSDP, for instance by building up resilience through education, training and exercises, and by streamlining the EU cyber-defence education and training landscape;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 c (new)
29 c. Believes that the EU and its Member States face an unprecedented threat in the form of state-sponsored and cyber attacks as well as cyber crime and terrorism; believes that the nature of cyber attacks makes them a threat that needs an EU-level response; encourages the Member States to provide mutual assistance in the event of a cyber attack against any one of them;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Underlines that the strategic partnership between the EU and NATO is fundamental to addressing the security challenges facing the EU and its neighbourhood; underlines that EU- NATO cooperation should be complementary and respectful of each other’s specificities and roles; is convinced that a stronger EU and NATO reinforce each other, creating more synergies and effectiveness for the security and defence of all partners; stresses that the EU-NATO strategic partnership is equally fundamental for the EU’s evolving CSDP and for the future of the Alliance, as well as for EU-UK relations after Brexit;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33 a. Stresses the importance of cooperation and integration in cyber security, not only between Member States, key partners and NATO, but also between different actors within society;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34 a. Stresses that Russia’s occupation in Ukraine is still ongoing, the Minsk agreements – without which there can be no solution to the conflict – have not been implemented and the illegal annexation and militarisation of Crimea continue; is deeply concerned that Russia's excessive exercises and military activities, hybrid tactics, including cyber- terrorism, fake news and disinformation campaigns, economic and energy blackmail are destabilising the Eastern Partnership countries and the Western Balkans, as well as are being targeted at Western democracies and increasing tensions within them; is concerned that the security environment surrounding the EU will remain highly volatile for years to come; reiterates the strategic importance of the Western Balkans for the security and stability of the EU and the need to focus and strengthen the EU's political engagement towards the region, including by strengthening the mandate of our Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions; is firmly convinced that in order to overcome the EU's vulnerability there is a need for more integration as well as coordination;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Considers it vital to further enhance cooperation with institutional partners, including the UN, NATO, the African Union and the OSCE, as well as strategic bilateral partners, such as the US; recommends taking forward CSDP partnerships in the fields of strengthening partners’ resilience and Security Sector Reform (SSR);
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET