BETA

6 Amendments of Brian SIMPSON related to 2008/0211(COD)

Amendment 2 #
Council position
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Member States may, while observing the general rules laid down in the Treaty, maintain or adopt provisions in force on ...*, aimed at ensuring more extensive protection of animals falling within the scope of this Directive than those contained in this Directive.
2010/06/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall provide funding for training, research, development and implementation of replacement methods.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, great apes shall not be used in procedures, subject to the use of the safeguard clause in Article 50.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Every two years, and for the first time two years after the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission shall, in consultation with Member States, conduct a review of the use of non-human primates in procedures and publish the results thereof. The review shall examine the impact of developments in technological, scientific and animal- welfare knowledge, and set targets for the implementation of validated replacement methods.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 45
The Commission and Member States shall contribute by various means, particularly financial to the development and scientific validation of alternative approaches that could provide the same or higher level of information as that obtained in procedures using animals but that do not involve the use of animals or use fewer animals or that entail less painful procedures and shall take such other steps as they consider appropriate to encourage research in this field.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 50
1. Where a Member State has justifiable grounds for believing that action is essential for the preservation of the species or in relation to an unexpected outbreak of a life threatening or debilitating clinical condition in human beings, it may authorise the use of great apes in procedures having one of the purposes referred to in Article 5(2)(a),(3) or 5; provided that the purpose of the procedure cannot be achieved by the use of other species than great apes or by the use of alternative methods. However, the reference to Article 5(2)(a) shall not be taken to include the reference to animals or plants. 2. The Member State shall immediately inform the Commission and the other Member States thereof, giving reasons for its decision and submitting evidence of the situation as described in paragraph 1 on which the provisional measure is based. 3. The Commission shall take a decision in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 51(2) within 60 days of receipt of the information from the Member State. This decision shall either: (a) authorise the provisional measure for a time period defined in the decision; or (b) require the Member State to revoke the provisional measure.Article 50 deleted Safeguard clause
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI