8 Amendments of Brian SIMPSON related to 2009/2155(INI)
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that onlythe statutory requirements should form the basis for CC control and should be easily understandable for farmers and control authorities;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that yearly CC controls for statutory management requirements (SMR) should be reduced, or even abolished, if there have only been a few infringementsif it can be shown that compliance has been high in recent years;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that Member States should be allowed to reduce the inspection quota to a specific lower limit if they have a risk analysis framework that complies with Community law requirements, along with evidence of high compliance;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Considers that the number of CC requirements should not steadily increaseonly increase where a thorough analysis of costs and benefits demonstrates a net benefit;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -16 a (new)
Paragraph -16 a (new)
-16 a. Requests that, in the interests of simplification and proportionality, the Commission review its policy of applying flat rate corrections in its clearance of accounts procedures and expects that its application of disallowance is proportionate to the risk to EU funds;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -21 a (new)
Paragraph -21 a (new)
-21a. Urges the Commission, through a stronger Pillar II, to ensure appropriate investment in innovation, research and development, in order to enable farmers to benefit from technological developments;